JPMorgan Chase: more drivers rely on Uber money, poorer-Uber, excellent drivers-IT information

Uber likes to say: I'm Uber is the driver, "an important source of revenue"!

This actually makes sense. In January 2015, Uber data display driver 24% Uber is their only source of income; 6% Uber is the most important, but not the only source of income; 38% Uber is only a small part of their source of income.

And one data show more Uber-dependent drivers, the more poverty.

This is the JPMorgan Chase group think tank Institute for JPMorgan data. The Institute collect data on 196,000 customers, income from the customer in October 2014 to September 2015 are more or less 30 from around the world "share" or "part-time" Economics (like Uber, and Airbnb). The Institute will these companies are divided into two categories: "labour" platform, which requires an investment of time and energy of the platform (such as Uber); "capital" platform or rental platform to own an asset (such as Airbnb).

According to JPMorgan data: "labour" platform to make money crowd, revenue at the lowest range of people (those earning less than $ 30,000) this way will earn nearly 30% earnings; income persons in the highest ($ 83,900 +) will pass through earned income nearly 20%.

"Services" platform of income data

And by "capital" platform among those who make money, earn money by this way only 10% to 11% per cent of its revenues.

"Capital" platform of income data

In the lower-income population, through the "services" platform to make money than by "capital" more people on the platform to make money.

Whilst the higher income groups and vice versa.

JPMorgan's initial results showed that through the "labour" platform to make money through this platform to compensate for the revenue shortage. And by "capital" platform to make money, and often rent their house or car to earn extra income.

The other hand, if most people by Uber and TaskRabbit these "services" platform to earn this income as the core of their monthly income, you will enter a vicious circle of income: the poor, depend on this income means more dependent on the income approach, will be the poorer.

Now, let us think carefully about "my Uber is an important source of revenue drivers" this sentence.

摩根大通：司机越依赖Uber赚钱，会越穷 - Uber,优步,司机 - IT资讯

Uber喜欢说:咱Uber是司机朋友“重要的收入来源”！

这话其实有道理。2015年1月，Uber的一项数据显示24%的司机表示Uber是他们的唯一收入来源；6%表示Uber是他们最重要的，但不是唯一的收入来源；38%表示Uber只是他们收入来源的一小部分。

而另一项数据却显示：越是依赖Uber的司机，越是贫穷。

这是摩根大通集团智囊团摩根大通研究所的数据。该研究所收集了19.6万顾客的数据，这些顾客在2014年10月到2015年9月的收入或多或少都有来自全球30个“分享”或“兼职”经济公司（如Uber和Airbnb）。该研究所将这些公司分成两大类:”劳务”平台，即需要投入时间和精力的平台（如Uber）；”资本”平台，即出租自己的某一资产的平台（如Airbnb）。

根据摩根大通集团数据:通过“劳务“平台赚钱的人群中，收入处于最低范围的人（年收入少于3万美元）会通过此途径赚取将近30%收入；而收入处于最高范围的人（8.39万美元+）会通过此途经赚取将近20%收入。

“劳务”平台收入数据

而在通过“资本”平台赚钱的人群中，通过此途经赚的的钱只占其总收入的10%到11%。

“资本”平台收入数据

在收入较低的人群中，通过“劳务“平台赚钱的人比通过”资本“平台赚钱的人多。

而收入较高的人群则反之。

摩根大通公司最初的研究结果显示：通过”劳工”平台赚钱的人通过此平台来弥补收入的不足。而通过“资本“平台赚钱的人，通常会出租自己的房子或车来赚取额外的收入。

另一方面，如果大部分人通过Uber和TaskRabbit这些“劳务“平台赚钱的人将此收入作为他们每月收入的核心，那么将会进入一个收入恶性循环:越穷，越依赖此收入途径；越依赖此收入途径，就会越穷。

现在，让我们好好思考一下“咱Uber是司机朋友重要的收入来源”这句话。