Three questions on China Unicom "serial"-China Unicom, China Unicom-IT news
Three questions on China Unicom "serial"

Advertise the manuscripts of the 12th, Xinhua Xinhua China Unicom adventure: 8 "big pit" lie to you privacy task force again aroused heated debate. Many netizens said that journalists encounter is not the case, but the telecom industry "overbearing clause" rampage years of problems and diseases, and in light of its own experience, raises three questions.

"Pack-years to life", not what are the terms of the King?

Manuscripts advertised shortly, the reporter received an annoying message, referred to are not clear "policy", "running a business maturity extension is normal, just like you have in the Bank regularly, would expire and turn into a current. "And, after years of monthly fees is" contract "that disagree can not do so.

Coincidence is that the same view in comments also appeared on Twitter. In this regard, the Netizen "JET30802" and one is saving money for interest, a deduction of money do you prefer without, can be the same thing? Telecommunications companies monopolize the resources to develop such unequal Treaty, against the interests of consumers, not what are the terms of the King? We didn't see the terms, there is no contract, it's "domineering" and "cool"!

Our name how many unfamiliar phone number?

Reporter's experience, without knowing, unauthorized use of personal information, which opened 6 new mobile number, many users say "shocked". Netizen "early Lin Mu" reply, but it was reported, who met the terms of the King, but all are nothing, nowhere to find rational. Our name on exactly how many unfamiliar phone number?

Many netizens said in the prepaid mobile phone users today, I still receive an unauthorized use of personal information, real name of the non-proliferation of phone cards, no doubt is the result of operators ' internal links inside job, inevitably hidden behind tunneling and acts of corruption. Vigorous implementation of prepaid mobile phone users, shoulder the important responsibility of telecom enterprises, would also help reduce telecommunications fraud and crime. If the operator's eyes "interest only" damage only themselves.

Consumer credit-impaired can do nothing?

Internet companies as the "user experience" for Dick's era, reporters questions about the blacklist on why not to inform, China Unicom customer service response: "so many users, nobody pay attention to someone else. "It was overbearing exposed by traditional telecom operators.

Netizens "all alone," said, "serial" is the Telecom problems, "I encountered four pits, still blacklisted. "Are the monopolistic businesses, who can make up for it? But if telecom terms of Overlord, even illegal due to impaired credit histories of individual consumers, who should bear the responsibility? So many human rights violations, did not pursue it?