Tesla's response to trademark infringement in China: zhanbaosheng end up failing for trademark infringement-Tesla, Tesla, Tesla-IT information Tesla's response to trademark infringement in China: zhanbaosheng will fail
China Merchants zhanbaosheng Tesla litigation of trademark infringement , a Tesla responded this morning, said Chinese regulators had withdrawn zhanbaosheng trademarks obtained improperly, zhanbaosheng's lawsuit does not make sense and will not affect the Tesla's business in China, zhanbaosheng trying to challenge China's regulators decided that this behavior will eventually fail.
Earlier this month, Chinese businessman zhanbaosheng to the third intermediate people's Court of Beijing on Tesla in Chinese tort lawsuit requiring Tesla closed car showroom and service center in China and boosting facilities to stop all sales and marketing activities in China, and paid zhanbaosheng about 23.9 million Yuan (3.9 million dollars) in damages.
Tesla spokesman Simon Sproule responded by saying zhanbaosheng attempts to steal property of Tesla, Tesla has not yet received or seen the petition currently. Tesla had previously submitted to the regulator charges against zhanbaosheng and win the case.
Today, Tesla's China head of an official statement. Said in a statement after China in two separate cases, the regulator has already withdrawn zhanbaosheng improperly obtained the trademark, it has become a fact. Zhanbaosheng trying to challenge China's regulators decided that this behavior will eventually fail.
Statement also shows that long before the zhanbaosheng lawsuit earlier this month, Tesla has to zhanbaosheng as the defendant has filed two civil lawsuits require zhanbaosheng compensation for the theft of Tesla's trademark.

In a statement that, long before the zhanbaosheng get the trademark, Tesla has been to create and use these trademarks, but this does not affect the Tesla's business in China, accounting for Baosheng theft of intellectual property does not affect the Tesla sales and delivery vehicles in China.
Earlier, the Chinese businessman zhanbaosheng registered trademarks of Tesla, and said it would establish a new energy automobile company, trademark disputes have also been contacted both sides, Tesla tried to buy the treasure of trademark ownership, but to no avail. Tesla's request, the State administration for industry and Commerce assessment and adjudication Board was abolished in July 2013 zhanbaosheng Tesla logo.
Following is Tesla's statement:
There can be no legitimate dispute that Tesla created and used these trademarks long before Mr. Zhan attempted to steal themfrom us in China. Mr. Zhan's lawsuit is a last-ditch effort in his unsuccessfulscheme. This lawsuit comes after twoseparate Chinese authorities have already canceled the trademark improperlyobtained by Mr. Zhan, and we are grateful for their support and confident thatMr. Zhan's appeals from those decisions will be unsuccessful. His lawsuit also follows two lawsuits thatTesla filed long ago against Mr. Zhan to obtain recompense for his theft of ourproperty. Since Mr. Zhan does notrightfully own the trademark at issue, it follows that his lawsuit is withoutany conceivable merit. None of thesematters has any impact on our ability to conduct business in China. We havebeen selling cars and are now delivering cars and will continue to do sowithout interference caused by Mr. Zhan's attempted theft of our intellectualproperty。
Disclaimer: there is no doubt that long before trying to steal these trade marks in China, Tesla has been creating and using these trademarks. Litigation was his unsuccessful plan's final blow. This litigation took place in China in two separate cases, the authorities have revoked the improperly obtained after the trademark. Support and are confident that we are very grateful to the Chinese authorities challenged administrative proceedings of the two trade mark revocation decision will ultimately fail. Long before he filed the lawsuit, Tesla has filed two civil actions as a defendant, demanding compensation for the theft of Tesla's trademark. Mr given is not in connection with the ownership of a trademark, he filed the lawsuit without any real meaning. All of these situations will not affect our business in China. We have been selling and delivery vehicles in China, covering theft of us intellectual property rights does not affect our continued sales and delivery vehicles in China.