Cat cat Mall Mall has angered China Security-days, my cat, and security-IT information Cat Mall has angered Chinese security

In the 1.2 billion into Alibaba evergrande football shangtian cats their network is being used in violation of copyright to court. This morning, China Security Association cat unauthorized sale of security badges and other items to cat and collect 8000 cases of loss of a trade company in Tai Hing Court hearing.

China Security Association said its security services is a national industry organization. According to the security service regulations regarding provisions of security guard work dress, wear signs, design 2011 China Security Association-security clothing and badges, patches, insignia, badges, and other service marks and posted on the news media in July 2011.

2011 security clothing all of copyrights and service marks owned by Association for security, no person shall, without authorization. Recently, the China Security Association found that a trading company in Beijing on the day cat nets much-sale 2011 security service marks of products such as badges .

China Security Association believes that Zhejiang Cat Networks Ltd, a trading company in Beijing, and with knowledge of the security association with products under copyright, in order to obtain illegal benefits to sales, are joint tort shall bear joint and several liability. A trading company in Beijing and Zhejiang Cat Networks Ltd to court, demands that the two defendants immediately stop the infringing act, and such costs as compensation for the economic losses amounted to 8000 Yuan .

Reply of a trading company, the company responsible for selling products, cap badge is not manufactured by the company, company stores selling cat and has been the company's punishment, the company shall bear no liability .

For the infringement complained, cat company reply said, my cat's company did not commit a tort; cat on site that the company has been involved in a lawsuit to clear. Hope the Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim.

7 China Security Association to the Court produced evidence, including copyright registration certificates to prove plaintiff's copyrighted; cat net shots, accused trading companies registered apparel specialty stores as defendants; facts also prove that the defendant violated the plaintiff's copyright certificate and the related costs. Finally the plaintiff took out a notice issued by the Ministry of public security, certification service marks published for security, publish content.

The trading company is still does not recognize the fact that infringing the plaintiff, said the plaintiffs failed to provide conclusive evidence of authenticity of the notary recognition Association does not endorse, once again, the company said: "in connection with the coat of arms is not produced by our company, our company is sales. ”

Cat company says China Security Association collecting or publishing of drawings should be an administrative authorization, should be public, the plaintiff shall not enjoy copyright; involved in designs and patterns on the plaintiffs to provide notary does not meet, while the plaintiff's costs are too high.