Chinese doctor false papers commissioned third party companies to write | | | doctors _ the history of science news

On September 20, the United States well-known Plagiarism plagiarism monitoring website iPlagiarism Watch by internationally renowned English plagiarism detection system (Chinese name: Ai Pulei) follow discovered false papers in English of the history of science in the world's biggest company, the company and a Brazil SCI journal (Genetics and Molecular Research) cooperation and the rate for Chinese scholars published a number of papers on allegations of plagiarism, fraud.

The Brazil magazine SCI h index

Chinese Academy of medical sciences researcher Xu Peiyang revealed in a blog post, a large number of County doctor's paper to the Brazil journal, accounting for 54.901% of the total amount of the journal publishes papers. In 2015, the journal China scholar articles to a 1605, the proportion is as high as 78.1%.

Web of science bloggers Tan Xinjie Plagiarism Watch reporting. Reports revealed the cause of the incident: some readers to the website anonymously, a Chinese team's article has serious plagiarism, Ai Pulei system for staff in testing and found one-third of the text are copied, while artificial than on finding similar documents chart is also consistent with the highest percentage.

In the second and third until the sixth highest percentage of similar literature when compared to manual charts, have been found in Figure 3 are basically the same, detection by flow cytometry results.

All articles in the same issue of the journal check found that many Chinese authors articles there are charts. It was concluded that, Brazil is China's SCI-tech journals and scholars of money magazine and, in addition, according to copying each other's charts and discovered four SCI journal (GMR,Medical Science Monitor,OncoTargets and Therapy,Diagnostic Pathology) has a problem.

Author of different units from China, in the same month to pitch with an SCI journal, published in the same issue, suggesting that these articles cannot be copied, but third-party manufacturing false papers to write company, magazine and fraud company cooperation.

Report recommends that the Government, universities and institutions, journals or publishers research, China should take measures to stop sliding into the abyss, and given the SCI Journal of higher impact factor from Thomson Reuters (Thomson Reuters) should come forward to stop this sort of thing.

Some netizens pointed out, Chinese copy of the article at best, affecting individuals and units, English plagiarism or academic misconduct will greatly impact State and reputation in the scientific community as a whole, more attention is needed.

Ai Pulei had already discovered the copying of a large number of published papers, including United States and the United Kingdom and other native English-speaking countries, France, and Germany, and Japan and some other scientific powers.

Responsible editor: Wu Yan

Article keywords:
Paper doctor of history of science fraud

I want feedback
Save a Web page
Observer network

大量中国医生论文造假 委托第三方公司代写|论文|科学史|医生_新闻资讯

　　9月20日，美国知名抄袭监测网站Plagiarism Watch通过国际知名英文论文抄袭检测系统iPlagiarism（中文名：艾普蕾）顺藤摸瓜，发现了世界科学史上最大规模的英文论文造假公司，该公司与一个巴西SCI杂志（Genetics and Molecular Research）默契合作，收费为中国学者发表了大量涉嫌抄袭、造假的论文。

该巴西杂志SCI 的 h指数

　　中国医学科学院研究员许培扬在博客中揭露，大量中国大陆医生的论文投到了这个巴西期刊，占该期刊发表论文总量的54.901%。2015年，该刊中国学者文章达到了1605篇，比例更是高达78.1%。

　　科学网博主谭新杰翻译了Plagiarism Watch的报告。报告披露了事件的起因：有读者向该网站匿名举报了一篇中国研究组的文章有严重抄袭，工作人员在用艾普蕾系统检测后发现确实有三分之一的文本抄袭，同时，人工比对发现了与其相似比例最高的文献有图表也基本一致。

　　在将第二篇、第三篇直至第六篇相似比例最高的文献进行人工图表比对后，陆续发现图3基本一致，流式细胞检测结果一致。

　　在将杂志的同一期的所有文章检查后发现，很多中国作者文章均出现了图表的一致。由此推测，这个巴西SCI期刊是针对中国学者交钱就发的杂志，此外，根据互 相抄袭的图表，又陆续发现了四个SCI杂志（GMR，Medical Science Monitor，OncoTargets and Therapy，Diagnostic Pathology）均有问题。

　　由于来自中国不同单位的作者，在同一个月内投到同一个SCI杂志，甚至发表在同一期，说明这些文章不可能相互抄袭，而是第三方论文造假代写公司制造的，杂志则与造假公司默契合作。

　　报告建议中国政府、大学和机构、杂志或出版商应该采取措施阻止中国研究滑向深渊，同时，赐予这些SCI杂志高影响因子的汤森路透（Thomson Reuters）应该出面阻止这样的事情。

　　有网友指出，中文文章的抄袭最多只是影响到个人和单位，英文文章抄袭或学术不端将极大的影响国家和整体科学界的声誉，需要进行更多的关注。

　　艾普蕾此前已发现了大量已发表论文的抄袭现象，其中不乏美国和英国等母语为英语的国家，也有法国、德国、日本等一些科技强国。

责任编辑：吴颜

文章关键词：
论文 科学史 医生 造假

我要反馈
保存网页
观察者网