"Golden age of ants": why good people once again, Yang Gailan _ news by relentless consumption in Gansu | |

Watching Yang Gailan committed suicide after killing four young children's news reporter mood difficult to calm. The case is tragic whenever conscience somewhat, for a family of six died, Ouch.

This year will be three mother meant to be remembered: chicken legs for seriously ill daughter mothers daughters lost their lives to save Tiger's mother, as well as Yang Gailan, the despair of life, buried with the mother and the whole family.

Journalists thought that love child is mother nature, and even if their biological mother of, have no right to deprive their children of the right to life--this should be common sense, that is the bottom line of human nature, it is then the mainstream. But when one of the ants in the spirit when turned, reporters have been very surprised and angry. At this point, "poverty leads to despair", "institutions should be responsible for" brushing a reporter's screen.

There is sufficient heat of public opinion, journalists to see facts, stories, rumors of the tripartite.

Truth, is the truth; stories, is after all, see dog blood, in fact, but began to deviate from the fact that part of the surface; rumors surface, purely rumors. Yang Gailan was fortunately not many rumors surface, its hype of fermentation depends on the story.

The event was initially published in local Lanzhou on the Western business daily newspaper, titled the leisure of a family of six have been poisoned and killed. Manuscript made no mention of family poverty status, but did not mention later became widely questioned "Lo was cancelled." That afternoon, there will be a review of the investigation: 6 deaths due to poverty in Gansu tragedy, generation mothers forced to drink poison in the flesh and blood to circulate online. Yang buildings were mentioned in the article, and removed the low.

Thus, Yang Gailan events were concerned, the appearance of ants in the spirit is making it a public event. "Deaths from poverty" such a rich story plots of the impact has been magnified, eventually move public opinion, won a lot of praise, comments, tears and crowding the screen.

But some friends later found that of the ants in the spirit, but a financial investment, and powder, and implementing financial recruitment and financial plans, to create a marketing paper. Its "outrage" is to live my life in the investment community widely spread his "social care" in order to attract potential customers for myself in this heavy calculations, our emotions, became a commercial copy of the play. At a press conference, marketing of life is tantamount to selling human blood bun, it is both evil and shameless!

Sold of the ants in the spirit of confrontation and conflict, consumption is about the poverty of imagination-as long as it's in line with expectations, can sell as long as it can give vent to their feelings, some people, just facts.

Suicide is a very complex social problem in rural areas, have been kidding, how many sociologists explain the theory that the question on how many. Yang Gailan reasons for committing such atrocities, may be poor, may have mental illness; perhaps family conflicts ... ... 10,000 step back and say, even if it is, and "Lo-cancelled", then who can prove that there is a connection? It is a fact that can't be explained by, so the story becomes the main character.

Yang Gailan event facts, enough to explain a word: she's living conditions are too poor and she committed suicide after killing their children, reason is not clear.

But it isn't popular, more markets, story, and poetic language.

"A crime about money, the person guilty; a man bread crime, society is guilty!"

"For them, the poor is not terrible, more terrible than the poor are losing hope and confidence. ”

"From Yang Gailan, life and death, is not selected questions, as required, but one for eating and sleeping options. On this, He Xi, death He Ai! "

……

Beautiful, and most readers could not say these words in the wrong, but it is Yang Gailan events regardless of the fact.

When some people say "Yang Gailan killed four children, she was forced by the desperate" when journalists are more likely to agree with today's another statement: "while Yang Gailan is desperate, but she killed four children."

You this human tragedy can be attributed to the suffering, grief and despair, but it won't change the fact that she killed her four children. Young children die, even without a struggle. They may not have thought of, the mother should have unconditional trust, would personally help them choose this netherworld.

Compassion, tears, curse of the Internet, full of righteous, as if in person at the scene, but in vain: who really see the horror lay there that four children? There are too many people only drank pesticide Yang Gailan's words: you don't understand.

Is that journalists do not understand, do not understand why some people can "understand" Yang Gailan behavior. Does a weak, right arms waving to weaker weaker? Poor, desperate, can a murderer reasons?

If this logic was established, then any of the bus fire, hold the bombs into the Metro, take chopper go to kindergarten, can be called "golden age ants" in this sign, all illegal and unscrupulous are washed and understanding, and pay a terrible price, will be the whole society!

Man Ant classes.

Our laws and regulations, primary provision, that is, a person's life, physical security should not be subjected to any kind of aggression. Moreover, the killing of children and should not be forgiven the world.

Gangster movies, even children with gusto roles, must really have no bottom line; during the war, knives to children, will be nailed to the pillar of shame never turn over history. "Over-population is easy to eat" is a big miracle, but don't forget, most parents sell their children when famine, get enough to live, but the children move away from her, we might live.

After all, not poison the child's life, is the bottom line of the bottom line!

Death cannot be resurrected, a family of six died, was to mourn. But if Yang Gailan vulnerable, while ignoring her crimes because sympathy, at least do not distinguish right from wrong, reporters feel that such values will make us pay a terrible social cost: the criteria of our social events without sound, deviation, thus ignoring the correct way to solve social problems.

Spirit and ants, poverty and Yang Gailan, created the concept of this confrontation, and emotional interpretation of the mosaic, is not conducive to construction and the mitigation of social problems in the countryside.

So where are our true way? There way early.

General Secretary XI Jinping pointed out: "to adhere to precise, accurate poverty for poverty alleviation, focusing on improving the effectiveness of storming out of poverty. Key is to find the way, building a good institutional mechanisms, precision application on the strategy confess, in precise advance practical work, accurate left laying on the ground. To solve ' who support ' problems, ensure clear real poverty, population, poverty, poverty-induced causes such as clear, in order to achieve by applying policy, one policy. ”

If we're willing to let emotional to rational, so precise and effective implementation of pro-poor policies, and more is that we eventually reached a consensus, rather than continue to dispute it.

Rather, we think, is the same as Yang Gailan, poverty and never read one book, of people in difficult situations, their material and spiritual double problem of poverty, in which the precise measures to be addressed? And our rule of law, and how they become rich on the road in their escort on the road to literacy?

Yang Gailan, reporter grief, journalists to pursue nature of the event, and then try to do something, so as to avoid the emergence of the next Yang Gailan. Golden Ant did write in the minds of some people, but it does not have, and never write a method to solve the problem, because he wants to, just public resonance.

We can sympathize with the weak, but should not be wrong; empathy is good, but love is not a generator.

Source: Changan sword

Responsible editor: Sun Ailin SN146

Article keywords:
Gansu province, Yang Gailan

I want feedback
Save a Web page

“盛世中的蝼蚁”:为何善良人们再次被无情消费|甘肃|杨改兰_新闻资讯

　　看完杨改兰杀死四个年幼孩子后自杀的新闻报道，记者的心情久久难以平静。该案之惨烈，但凡稍有良知者，都会为这一家六口的惨死，痛心不已。

　　今年注定会有三位母亲被人记住：为重病女儿偷鸡腿的母亲；为救女儿命丧虎口的母亲，以及杨改兰，这位对生活感到绝望，并让全家陪葬的母亲。

　　记者本以为，爱孩子该是母亲的天性，且即便是生身之母，也无权剥夺孩子的生命权——这应该是常识，更该是人性的底线，是大家持论的主流。但当一篇《盛世中的蝼蚁》横空出世时，记者开始感到非常诧异和生气。此时，“贫穷导致绝望”、“体制应该负责”，刷了记者的屏。

　　一件有足够舆论热度的事，在记者看来，要看事实面、故事面、谣言面三方。

　　事实面，就是事情的真相；故事面，是事情经过众口，猎奇狗血，本于事实，但开始偏离事实面的那部分；谣言面，单纯就是造谣。杨改兰一案谣言面所幸不多，它的发酵有赖于故事面的炒作。

　　这一事件最初刊登在兰州当地媒体《西部商报》上，标题为《康乐一家六口相继服毒身亡》。原稿没有提到杨家贫困的状况，更没提到后来成为广泛质疑点的“低保被取消”。而当天下午，就有一篇《调查：甘肃因贫致6人死亡惨案，80后母亲强迫亲骨肉喝毒药》在网上传播。文中提到了杨家的危房，和被取消的低保。

　　于是，杨改兰事件受到了关注，《盛世中的蝼蚁》的出现更是令它成为公众事件。“因贫死亡”这样富有冲击力的故事性情节被放大，最终撬动了舆论，获得了大量点赞、评论、眼泪和刷屏。

　　然而一些小伙伴后来发现，《盛世中的蝼蚁》，不过是一个理财投资公号，为了吸粉，和执行金融人才招聘及理财计划，打造出的营销软文。它的“义愤填膺”，是为了让自己在投资圈中被广泛传播；他的“社会关怀”是为了替自己吸引潜在客户；在这重重算计中，我们的感情，成为了这个商业文案的玩弄品。在记者看来，以人命做营销，无异于卖人血馒头，实在是既邪恶，又无耻！

　　《盛世中的蝼蚁》卖的是对立和冲突，消费的是人们对于贫穷的想象——只要它符合预期，就能大卖；只要它能宣泄情感，一些人，就枉顾事实。

　　农村自杀是个很复杂的社会问题，曾有人戏言，有多少位社会学家，就有多少套阐释该问题的理论。杨改兰犯下如此暴行的原因，或许有穷，或许有心理方面的疾病；或许有家庭矛盾……退一万步说，就算真和“低保被取消”有关，那么谁又能证明其中有必然联系？这是事实面所无法解释的，于是故事面变成了主角。

　　杨改兰事件的事实面，一句话足以阐释：她生存的环境太贫穷；她逼死自己的孩子后自杀，原因不清楚。

　　然而事实并不招人喜欢，更有市场的，是故事，和诗一样的语言。

　　“一个人为钱犯罪，这个人有罪；一个人为面包犯罪，这个社会有罪!”

　　“于他们而言，穷并不可怕，比穷更可怕的是失去了希望和信心。”

　　“于杨改兰，生和死，已经不是道选择题，而是一件吃饭睡觉一样的必选、单选项。到这种份上，生亦何喜，死亦何哀!”

　　……

　　多好听啊，而且大多数读者无法说这些话说得不对，但它却和杨改兰事件的另一个事实面无关。

　　当一些人在说“虽然杨改兰杀害了四个孩子，但她是被绝望所迫”时，记者更倾向于赞同今天遇到的另一种表述：“虽然杨改兰是绝望的，但她杀害了四个孩子”。

　　你可以将这幕人间惨剧归因于苦难、悲伤和绝望，但它改变不了她亲手杀死自己四个孩子的事实。年幼的孩子们，死亡时，甚至没有挣扎。他们或许没有想到，本该无条件信赖着的母亲，会亲手帮他们选了这条黄泉路。

　　网上的同情、眼泪、痛骂，充满了义正辞严，仿佛亲临其境，可又苍白无力：谁又真真正正见过那四个孩子躺在那里的惨状呢？有太多人，只看见喝了农药的杨改兰的那句话：你不懂。

　　是，记者的确不懂，不懂为何一些人竟能“理解”杨改兰的行为。难道一个弱者，就有权利将武器挥向更弱的弱者吗？穷，绝望，就可以是杀人的理由吗？

　　如果这个逻辑成立，那么任何一个公交纵火的、拿着炸弹闯地铁的、拿着砍刀去幼儿园的，都可以被追封为“盛世蝼蚁”，在这个符号下，一切违法和无良都得到了洗刷和谅解，而付出惨痛代价的，将是整个社会！

　　人非蚁类。

　　我们的法律法规，首要规定的，就是一个人的生命、人身安全不容受到任何性质的侵害。更何况，杀害孩子，是无论如何不会被世人原谅的。

　　黑帮片里，连孩子都不放过的角色，一定心狠手辣没有底线；而在战争中，将屠刀挥向儿童的，也一定会被历史钉在耻辱柱上永不翻身。“饿殍遍野易子而食”是大惨象，可也别忘了，饥荒时大多数父母会将孩子卖掉，换得的粮食不够自己活，但孩子离开自己，兴许就能活命。

　　说到底，不荼毒孩子的生命，是底线中的底线！

　　人死终究不能复生，一家六口惨死，是要哀悼的。但若因为杨改兰的弱势，而忽视了她的罪行；因为同情，而连起码是非都不分的话，记者觉得，这样的价值观会让我们付出可怕的社会代价：我们对于社会事件的评判标准在毫无声息地跑偏，从而无视了解决社会问题的正确途径。

　　盛世和蝼蚁，贫穷与杨改兰，这种对立概念的创造，和情绪化的拼接解读，根本无益于农村的建设和社会问题的缓解。

　　那么我们真正该走的路在哪里？路早就有了。

　　习近平总书记指出：“要坚持精准扶贫、精准脱贫，重在提高脱贫攻坚成效。关键是要找准路子、构建好的体制机制，在精准施策上出实招、在精准推进上下实功、在精准落地上见实效。要解决好‘扶持谁’的问题，确保把真正的贫困人口弄清楚，把贫困人口、贫困程度、致贫原因等搞清楚，以便做到因户施策、因人施策。”

　　如果我们还愿意让情绪归于理性，那么精准扶贫政策的有效实施，才更应该是我们最终达成的共识，而非继续争议下去。

　　我们更应该思考的，是像杨改兰一样，贫穷且没有念过一天书，处境艰辛的人，他们的物质精神双贫困问题，该以何种精准扶贫措施得到解决？而我们的法治，又能怎样在他们脱贫致富的道路上，在他们提高文化水平的道路上保驾护航？

　　面对杨改兰一家，记者悲愤，记者要去追寻事件的本质，然后努力做点什么，从而避免下一个杨改兰的出现。《盛世中的蝼蚁》的确写出了一些人的心声，但它没有，也绝不会写出解决问题的方法，因为他要的，仅仅只是舆论共鸣而已。

　　我们可以同情弱者，但不应是非不分；有同情心固然好，但爱，不是发电机。

　　来源：长安剑

责任编辑：孙爱林 SN146

文章关键词：
甘肃 杨改兰

我要反馈
保存网页