Shenzhen village official Red and black: a village officer a bribe 31 million
Shenzhen enterprises filed, you may immediately think of Huawei, Tencent and other Star enterprise, but one category of enterprises while your attention more, but without prejudice to its pivotal position in Shenzhen.
That is, the community joint-stock company.
Through a picture, let us feel the weight of Community joint-stock cooperative enterprises in Shenzhen.
Estimate each Shenzhen people are not strangers, one of the landmark building in Shenzhen, "Beijing-based 100."
CAI Wu Wei, it was communities limited liability company involved in the reconstruction of old city's masterpiece, is also a microcosm of the successful company limited of Shenzhen community as a whole.
With the rapid development of SAR for more than 30 years, communities Corporation is now an integral part of Shenzhen's economic and social.
Statistics from the 2013, Shenzhen City has 942 community Corporation, shareholders of 293,000 people, total assets amounted to 118.653 billion yuan, with collective land, mountain-608 square kilometers.
In other words, accounting for only 1.8 per thousand of the total number of enterprises in the city community of joint-stock company, it has about 1/3 land in the city; only company shareholders 2% of the city's population, but accounted for 85% of the population of the city is the landlord.
Rapid development of the company and shareholders benefit.
A case study of Nanwan Street, Longgang District, Nan ling, from a small fishing village to the per capita income (dividends) of up to 150,000 yuan Cun, miracle nationally renowned.
This is the outcome of the reform and opening up and some intelligent, thoughtful reflected village.
In some communities with excellent development joint stock company, Chairman of management in particular played an important role. But in the face of such huge assets, in the colored businessmen's "encirclement and suppression", some in Shenzhen "village officials" lost ... ...
According to statistics, since 2005, the community AG case in Shenzhen have investigated and dealt with more than 180 cases, near-violation cases, Chairman of 50% community shares in the company, and Chairman, Vice Chairman, more than more than 110.
Some cases involved more amount of large, poor plot, is alarming.
For example, "2 billion village" of the original streets of Longgang, Shenzhen South Union Community Committee Director Zhou Weisi, a one-time dare taking bribes from developers of 31 million Yuan, also holding a number of "local", "Virgo".
Strictly speaking, the village is not official, but large amounts of corruption made some corrupt officials within the framework of "catch up".
The high concentration of power, coupled with weak supervision and restraint, for some communities, Chairman of joint-stock companies can do whatever they want. Control does not execute the articles of incorporation, does not comply with collective decision-making procedures, squander collective funds ... ...
Surface prosperity of individual joint-stock companies, but in fact has long been the company's management of collective assets embezzled, into a "shell", only "negative-value" assets.
Especially in projects such as urban renewal, individual privately established, Chairman of joint-stock company "concealed accounts", between the interests of private developers transfer, shareholder oversight, regulators find that oversight in the financial accounts of the company, become a significant risk.
In April 2013, longhua street discipline and tolerance by the people before the bullpen joint stock companies Woan corruption, Baoan district people's Congress representative, Zhong Wei, Chairman of joint-stock companies before the bullpen balls, 11 people to outline the investigation.
The case involved the company 19, involved more than 30 people, more than more than 300 bank accounts, involving capital of 120 million Yuan, the property, the land value of 1 billion yuan.
Such a huge amount of corruption, why don't you call shocking?
Of course, investors will not suffer, let go. In recent years, complaints about the petition of Community joint-stock companies violating increasing proportion has reached about 30%.
For such corruption, we appoint the stiff.
According to statistics, the city discipline inspection organs have investigated and dealt with the joint-stock company 2012-2015, Chairman of 62 people, about levels of investigation "leaders" 10% of the total number.
Among them, the 2012 14, 2013 7, 2014 16, 2015 to 25, the number increases.
Of course, punishing the more radical measures.
Organic village official corruption can take the biggest reason is that the "three-capital" (capital, assets and resources) management and utility of unclear and not transparent.
Monitor randomly, with no clear legal standard, is not mandatory.
Therefore, the current municipal government is studying the Bill to amend the joint-stock company, promoting collective assets, collective asset management, real-time online monitoring and study abroad (border) license management "four platforms" construction.
Development the city area (area), "four platforms" the basic norms and standards, clear asset transactions, regulatory rules, strengthen the management of collective assets in the city to ensure that collective asset increment.
Currently, this work is advancing steadily, nearing the city open.
Only with the "three-capital" openness and transparency, and Shenzhen "village" of powers only to be caged, village official corruption puzzle is expected to crack.
(Editors: Xu Yonggang UN006)
2016-08-10 19:35:00
Surging
深圳村官红与黑：某村主任一次收受贿赂3100万
提起深圳企业，你可能立刻会想到华为、腾讯等明星企业，但有一类企业虽然你关注不多，却不妨碍它在深圳举足轻重的地位。
那就是，社区股份合作公司。
先通过一张图，让我们感受一下社区股份合作企业在深圳的分量。
估计每一个深圳人都不会陌生吧，深圳标志性建筑之一“京基100”。
它是蔡屋围社区股份有限公司参与旧城改造的杰作，也是整个深圳社区股份有限公司的一个成功缩影。
伴随着特区30多年的高速发展，社区股份有限公司如今已是深圳经济社会不可或缺的组成部分。
2013年的统计数据显示，深圳全市有942家社区股份有限公司，股民29.3万人，资产总额达1186.53亿元，拥有集体土地、山林608平方公里。
换言之，只占全市企业总数的1.8‰的社区股份合作公司，却拥有全市约1/3土地；只占全市人口的2%公司股民，却是占到全市85%人口的房东。
公司快速发展，股民当然受益。
以龙岗区南湾街道南岭村为例，从一个小渔村到人均年收入（分红）达15万元的富裕村，发展奇迹全国闻名。
这是改革开放的成果，也是一些有头脑、有想法的村干部的才能体现。
在一些发展良好的社区股份合作公司，管理层尤其是董事长起到了重要作用。但在如此庞大的资产面前，在各色商人的“围剿”下，有些深圳“村官”迷失了……
据统计，2005年以来，深圳共查处社区股份公司案件180多宗，其中近50%是社区股份公司董事长违纪违法案件，查处董事长、副董事长110多名。
一些案件涉案人数之多，金额之大，情节之恶劣，令人触目惊心。
譬如，有“20亿村官”之称的原深圳龙岗街道南联社区村委会主任周伟思，一次性就敢收受开发商的贿赂3100万元，还牵出多名“局座”、“处座”。
严格来讲，村官不是官，但贪腐数额之大却让一些体制内的贪官都“望尘莫及”。
权力的高度集中，加上乏力的监督约束，让一些社区股份合作公司董事长几乎可以为所欲为。独断专行，不执行公司章程，不遵守集体决策程序，随意挥霍集体资金……
个别股份合作公司表面繁荣，但实际上集体资产早已被公司管理层贪污挪用，成了一个“空壳”，只剩下“负资产”。
特别是在城市更新等项目中，个别股份合作公司董事长私自设立“账外账”，私下与开发商之间的利益输送，股民难监督、监管部门难发现，在公司财务帐目上也监管不到，成为重大风险点。
2013年4月，龙华新区纪工委查办了民治街道牛栏前股份合作公司腐败窝案，宝安区人大代表、牛栏前股份合作公司董事长钟伟球等11人被立案查处。
该案涉及公司19家，涉案人员超过30人，银行账户达300多个，涉及资金1.2亿元，物业、土地价值10亿元。
如此数额巨大的贪腐，怎么不叫人触目惊心？
当然，遭殃的股民是不会善罢甘休的。近年来，关于社区股份合作公司违纪违法的信访投诉逐年上升，占比已达30%左右。
对于这种恶劣的腐败行为，我们纪委绝不手软。
据统计，2012-2015年我市纪检机关共查处股份合作公司董事长62 人，约占查处的各级“一把手”总数的10%。
其中，2012年14人，2013年7人，2014年16人，2015年25人，数量逐年攀升。
当然，严惩更要治本。
村官贪腐有机可趁的最大原因就在于，“三资”（资金、资产、资源）的管理和实用不清楚，不透明。
监管的随意性较大，没有明确的法律规范，也不具备强制性。
因此，目前市委市政府正在研究修订股份合作公司条例，推进集体资产交易、集体资产管理、财务实时在线监管和出国（境）证照管理“四个平台”建设。
制定全市各区（新区）“四个平台”建设的基本规范和标准要求，明确资产交易范围、监管规则等，切实加强对全市集体资产交易的管理，确保集体资产保值增值。
目前，这项工作正稳步推进，即将在全市推开。
唯有“三资”公开透明，深圳“村官”的权力才有能被关进笼子，村官贪腐迷局才有望破解。
(责任编辑：徐永刚 UN006)
2016-08-10 19:35:00
澎湃
