"Didi" trademark belong small Orange technology: there are "drop"-the drop, small Orange technologies, di di-IT information

Reporter was informed on June 2 from the Hangzhou municipal intermediate people's Court, has raised community concerns "Didi" trademark infringement has recently completed its mediation. Beijing small Orange, Ltd won "Didi" series of trademark transfer, plaintiff's wonderful film Party withdraws. In May 2014, the wonderful shadow microelectronics Ltd, Ningbo science and Technology Park, Hangzhou good shadow electronics limited (both companies referred to as wonderful shadow company), "Didi taxi" acts of trademark infringement by Sue little companies. The cause of the Hangzhou Intermediate Court accepted. In May, the small Orange announced a "Didi taxi" officially changed its name to "take a taxi to the last drop."

It is understood that wonderful film in May 2012 and trademarks issued by the business sector, "Didi", approved use of categories including computer programs (downloadable software). Wonderful shadow company, little company is registered only after this "Didi taxi".

Wonderful movie studios sued for little companies to stop infringement, published a statement in the national mainstream media eliminate, and compensation for loss of 80 million Yuan and 200,000 rights costs to be borne. Hangzhou, this is the highest amount of trademark infringement litigation so far.

In April 2015, the Hangzhou intermediate court official Micro-Blog "concept of Hang Fa micro" live video of the trial process, this topic was 616,000 Internet users attention.

According to the Hangzhou intermediate court to introduce, in the case, although the parties constitute infringement argued, tit-for-tat, but have expressed a strong willingness to mediate. The hospital undertook judge through multiple phone calls, face to face consultations and facilitate the trademark transfer agreement the parties.

Contractors said, reconciliation of small Orange company, is a wonderful film, and win-win results. He also reminded, emerging Internet companies to establish the concept of respect for intellectual property rights, attention to avoid intellectual property rights, brand establishment of preparation, avoid disputes.

“嘀嘀”商标正式归属小桔科技：还有“滴滴” - 滴滴,小桔科技,嘀嘀 - IT资讯

记者6月2日从杭州市中级人民法院获悉，曾引发社会关注的“嘀嘀”商标侵权案已于近期完成调解。北京小桔科技有限公司获得了“嘀嘀”系列商标权的转让，原告妙影公司一方则撤回起诉。2014年5月，杭州妙影微电子有限公司、宁波市科技园区妙影电子有限公司(两公司简称妙影公司)以“嘀嘀打车”商标构成侵权行为为由起诉小桔公司。该案由杭州中院受理。同年5月，小桔公司宣布将“嘀嘀打车”正式更名为“滴滴打车”。

据了解，妙影公司于2012年5月获得工商部门批准核发的商标“嘀嘀”，核定使用类别包括计算机程序(可下载软件)。妙影公司称，小桔公司是在此之后才申请注册“嘀嘀打车”。

妙影公司起诉要求小桔公司停止侵权，在全国主流媒体上刊登声明消除影响，并赔偿损失8000万元，承担20万元维权费用。这是杭州地区迄今为止诉讼标的额最高的商标侵权案。

2015年4月，杭州中院官方微博“杭法观微”视频直播该案庭审过程，这一话题受到61.6万名网友的关注。

据杭州中院介绍，案件审理中，双方当事人虽然对是否构成侵权各执一词、针锋相对，但均表达了强烈的调解意愿。该院承办法官通过多次电话沟通、面对面磋商，促使双方当事人达成了商标转让协议。

承办法官表示，和解对小桔公司、妙影公司而言是一个共赢结果。他同时提醒，新兴的互联网企业要树立尊重知识产权的理念，注意避让他人知识产权，做好品牌创立的前期准备，避免纷争。