The Ministry of Foreign Affairs: us should distinguish between commercial freedom of navigation and ship-infested free

News Agency in Beijing on May 11, US officials repeatedly referred to "freedom of navigation program", Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang said during the regular press conference to refute, us confuse freedom of commercial navigation and ship-infested concept not expressly conferred by the United Nations Convention on the law of the right of warships to innocent passage, the United States should respect the basic facts.

A reporter asked, State Department officials said Russell 10th, freedom of navigation operations is very important for small States. If the world's most powerful navies can sail in international law allows, what will happen to small warships? Such as American warships were unable to exercise their rights under international law, fishing boats and freighters, how big can avoid being blocked? Comment on this?

"United States officials began to pay attention to international law, and that's good. And we hope the United States will ratify and accede to the United Nations Convention on law of the sea, this talk of international law would make them sound more convincing. "Lu Kang responded.

Lu Kang said, the US official said "freedom of navigation is very important for small countries", but seems to forget to distinguish between commercial freedom of navigation and ship-infested free. Small as in the country, of course, want to ensure that the commercial freedom of navigation in accordance with international law, and this free never so far in the South China Sea issue. But no country, like the United States, advocating warship rampage free of violations of international law.

He pointed out that the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the law of the foreign ships to innocent passage through the territorial waters of other countries, but that right was not expressly conferred on warships. United States refuses to ratify the Convention, was robbed in the so-called freedom of navigation program was launched before the signing of the Convention, from the very start, opposed by many countries, especially small countries. Hope that American officials are talking about small countries feel, first of all respect this basic fact.

"I also hope that when the next American officials talk about the freedom of navigation, reporters ask him/her to clarify what is the commercial navigation also is a military navigation. "He said.

(Editors: Pan Yi burn UN657)
2016-05-11 18:45:31
Surging

外交部：美方应区分商业航行自由和军舰横行自由

　　中新社北京5月11日消息，针对美官员屡次提及“航行自由计划”，中国外交部发言人陆慷在当日的例行记者会上驳斥称，美方混淆商业航行自由和军舰横行自由的概念，《联合国海洋法公约》未明确赋予军舰无害通行权，美方应尊重基本事实。

　　有记者问，美国务院官员拉塞尔10日称，航行自由行动对小国很重要。如果世界最强大的海军都无法在国际法允许的海域航行，小国军舰将会怎样？如美军舰都无法行使国际法赋予的权利，渔船和货轮又怎能避免被大国阻拦？中方对此有何评论？

　　“美国官员开始重视国际法了，这很好。而且，我们希望美方尽快批准并加入《联合国海洋法公约》，这样就会使自己再谈国际法时听起来比较有说服力。”陆慷回应称。

　　陆慷表示，美方官员说“航行自由对小国很重要”，但似乎又忘了区分商业航行自由和军舰的横行自由了。小国同大国一样，当然都希望确保符合国际法的商业航行自由，而这个自由在南海地区到目前为止从没问题。但没有哪个国家会像美方一样主张违反国际法的军舰的横行自由。

　　他指出，《联合国海洋法公约》规定，外国船舶可以无害通过他国领海，但未明确赋予军舰这一权利。美国拒不批准公约，却抢在公约签订前推出了所谓的航行自由计划，从一开始就遭到了许多国家、特别是中小国家的反对。希望美方官员在谈小国感受时，首先尊重这一基本事实。

　　“我还希望，下次美方官员再谈航行自由时，记者朋友们先请他/她澄清一下指的到底是商业航行还是军事航行。”他说。

(责任编辑：潘奕燃 UN657)
2016-05-11 18:45:31
澎湃