Play online games for 36 hours straight, man sudden death-death of Internet cafes, Internet cafes, information on healthy living-IT

In Internet cafes, 36 consecutive hours, 30-year old man Xu died at the Internet café. Reporter learned this morning, Tongzhou district court verdict Internet cafes take on 10% responsibilities.

Xu Qin and his wife to the Court, Xu was their son of the deceased. March 2015 Xu in Tongzhou district of Beijing Internet cafes within the Internet, inside the Internet after death. Xu and his wife said that when her son died, they had not received a call from Internet cafes until receiving notice from the police station the next day. Plaintiff believes the Internet until death in the Internet cafes, the plaintiff said that all Internet cafes in the absence of duly approved by the relevant departments under, in secret within a 1000-square-meter site to open Internet cafes, in the absence of any cases of illegal unlicensed Internet cafes to open conditions, which his son, Xu was killed. Violates the provisions is open 24 hours and Internet cafes, and the Internet should have the duty to inform and help, so the plaintiff believed Internet cafes should be liable, requiring total compensation of 1670438 Yuan.

Bar disagreed in court for compensation. For the plaintiff loses their regret and understanding. But the plaintiff's son Xu is an adult, should control responsibility for their own actions. Business Internet cafes and Internet cafes have legal qualification, and by the Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau site security audits. Two plaintiffs in the lawsuit say the facts described in facts, his son date the plaintiff rushed to the scene of the incident, and made record in the police station, and said it was illegal Internet cafes, caused adverse effects to the defendant and huge economic losses, reserves the right to prosecute.

After the Court said Xu in the Internet in the process of death, identified the cause of death "does not rule out disease death". Xu as a person with full civil capacity for up to 36 hours of uninterrupted Internet access, leading to tiredness, eventually leading to death. Occurrence of death itself is at fault, should bear civil liability. Although Internet cafes open all night is not against the rules, but Xu under continuous Internet access for as long as 36 hours, bar staff without any one person to humanity remind the Xu online time is too long, so Internet cafes as a going concern to Xu also assume corresponding liability for sudden death. Two views of the plaintiff bar is not doing your duty, the Court found that Xu died suddenly, sitting near some the first time and had time to dial 120 emergency phone cases, waiting next to the bar staff in the 120 first-aid personnel, and emergency personnel arrived at the scene after the rescue alert, Internet Xu has been fulfilling the duty to rescue.

Reporter learned that, in the end, court 10% liability Internet cafes, compensate the plaintiff amounted to 96025.8 trillion yuan. After service of the decision there's no appeal.

连续打网游36小时，男子网吧猝死 - 猝死,网吧,健康生活 - IT资讯

因连续在网吧上网36小时，30岁的男子徐某猝死在网吧里。记者上午获悉，通州法院一审判决网吧承担10%的责任。

老徐和妻子秦某起诉到法院，死者徐某是他们的儿子。2015年3月徐某在北京市通州区某网吧内进行上网，后在网吧内死亡。老徐夫妇称，儿子猝死时他们未接到网吧的电话，直至次日才接到派出所通知。二原告认为其子上网至死亡均在该网吧内，二原告称该网吧在没有经过相关部门合法批准的情况下，在一千平米的场所内秘密开设黑网吧，在不具备任何网吧开设条件的情况下违法无照经营，导致其子徐某死亡。并且网吧违反24小时营业规定，且网吧应该有告知和救助的义务，所以二原告认为网吧应当承担赔偿责任，要求共计赔偿人民币1670438元。

在法庭上网吧表示不同意进行赔偿。对于二原告失去孩子他们表示遗憾和理解。但是二原告之子徐某是成年人，应该对自己的行为有控制责任。并且称网吧有合法经营网吧的资质，并且通过了北京市公安局经营场所的安全审核。二原告在诉称中所述的情况大量事实失实，在其子事发之日二原告就赶到了现场，并且在派出所做了笔录，且称其是黑网吧，给被告造成了恶劣影响和巨大经济损失，保留追诉权利。

后经法院审理认为：徐某在网吧上网的过程中猝死，经鉴定死亡原因“不排除疾病死亡”。徐某作为完全民事行为能力人长达36小时不间断上网，致其身体过度疲劳，最终导致死亡。对死亡后果的发生其自身有过错，应该承担相应的民事责任。虽然网吧通宵营业并不违反规定，但徐某连续上网36小时之久的情况下，网吧工作人员无任何一人对徐某上网时间过长进行人性化提醒，故网吧作为经营主体对徐某猝死亦承担相应的赔偿责任。对于二原告主张网吧未尽到救助义务的意见，法院认为徐某猝死事发突然，在临近就坐的张某第一时间发现并已及时拨打120急救电话的情况下，网吧工作人员在旁等候120急救人员，并在急救人员到场抢救后报警，网吧已经对徐某尽到了相应的救助义务。

记者获悉，最终，法院判决网吧承担10%的赔偿责任，赔偿二原告共计人民币96025.8元。判决送达后双方均未上诉。