North Zou Fang took the Court of second instance against Zou Heng fu case _ news reports as evidence | Zou Heng fu | Peking University news

　　

Legal evening news (reporter Wang Wei) Zou Heng fu and Peking University's reputation right infringement in court this morning in a ne bis in idem, for instance was found to constitute an infringement, Zou Heng fu pointed out that its connection with Twitter is just aiming at the moral corruption that were rampant, and that their microblogged content does not see.

　Professor Tweeting "North Kinky sticks too much"

On August 21, 2012 at 9 o'clock 20 or so, Professor Zou Heng fu real name posted a message on SINA weibo, "Dean of Peking University in Taoyuan PKU treatment room while eating a dream if you see the beautiful waiters will inevitably start to them commit adultery. Dean, Professor of Peking University is no exception. So, dream peach business is hot. In addition to Zou Heng fu, North sex stick too much. ”

Less than a few hours, the microblog is forwarded by almost 30,000, more than 5,000 comments. No Zou Heng fu Jiang Langlang, spokesman responded by saying the North of Peking University says things PKU will reserve the right to pursue their legal obligations.

On August 31, 2012, the Peking University Peking University News Center released on "Zou Heng fu weibo" involved in the content of the third statement, saying the North has sued Zou Heng fu, the indictment was lodged with the Court.

September 7 at 3 o'clock in the afternoon, posted a message on its website, the Haidian Court, said Peking University versus defendant Zou Heng fu defamation dispute case, filed on the same day.

On December 24, 2013, Zou Heng fu said he plans to visit the United States, found to be restricted from leaving the country. Their lawyers said border control decisions according to relevant regulations of the Haidian District Court, they have sued.

First-instance decisions Zou Heng fu weibo apologized to the North for 7 days

The morning of January 20, 2014, Tao Yuan, Peking University and the Beijing dream catering limited v Zou Heng fu defamation dispute cases in Beijing's Haidian District Court trial.

Tao Yuan, Peking, and dreams lawsuit says Zou Heng fu weibo concocted, fabricating facts, serious damage to their reputation, asked Zou Heng fu immediately removes the decree nisi torts Twitter three days in a row over more than 10 media, such as a public apology.

During the hearing, two plaintiffs submitted a notarized Zou Heng fu weibo and user comments and other evidence, but Zou Heng fu party evidence submitted does not contain what he described as evidence of sex, fornication, Zou Heng fu counsel says Zou Heng fu Tao Yuan Restaurant, has been to more than 20 times the dream, in blogger's comments are seen and heard with my own ears listening. Even if the Court repeatedly asked him about whether there is evidence that, lawyers said, "there is evidence, but does not provide."

Zou Heng fu did not appear in court. His lawyer, Zou Heng Fu criticized individual professors of Beijing University there are lifestyle issues, if the right of honour by individual professors sued North not qualified plaintiff in the case, has no right to sue.

Lawyer says Zou Heng fu has received a number of insider corruption reflect individual professors of Beijing University life material, but Zou Heng fu weibo was meant to criticize corruption in good faith, rather than reveal the privacy of individual professors, nor is it to satisfy the public's curiosity, so it does not expose these materials, requests the Court to dismiss the second plaintiff.

August 20, 2014, 9:30 A.M., Haidian District Court sentencing, adopted decisions Zou Heng fu weibo apologized to the North, lasting 7 days. Zou Heng Fu appealed.

Relationship between teachers and female students reported morning the scene when the evidence is submitted

9:30 A.M., Zou Heng fu and Peking University for the honor of dispute in a case in which a Court of appeal, was an appeal to the party also knows the Tao Yuan Restaurant, restaurant dreams co, the three parties are the lawyers to appear in court.

According to court investigation, Zou Heng fu's current status is the Central University of finance and President of the China Institute of economic management.

Zou Heng fu appeal requests to revoke a verdict, legal judgment dismissed the Tao Yuan Restaurant, Peking, and dream of all claims.

Zou Heng fu believes that first-instance judgments on facts and applicable law there is a serious mistake. Today they have to submit a news report as new evidence, as is the relationship between men and women teachers and schoolgirls. Zou Heng fu was disclosed the teachers have improper relationships with staff, did not say that have improper relationships with staff at Peking University, did not constitute reputation right infringement of Peking University.

Peking University, argues that at Peking University as a legal person and of course enjoy the reputation, which is based on law.

North believes that Zou Heng fu verdict one-sided understanding, and professors, teachers, heads of Department and the school mutually exterior concept confusion on the issue. Zou Heng fu Taoyuan dream event that is raised by the present case before the so-called Professor, Department head, Dean of adultery as a waitress, but Zou Heng fu failed to produce any evidence against the legitimate rights and interests of a variety of civil subject, serious consequences are obvious and violations. Peking University, agreed with the judgment of the first instance.

At the trial, both sides around the subject of litigation at Peking University, as well as micro-blog debate whether tort issues. North said, after the incident contact Zou Heng fu asked him to tell the specific figures of the time, intending to contact the Commission for discipline inspection, Zou Heng fu gave no clue. Zou Heng fu admitted that dreams of Taoyuan was not what they see, but hear with my ears. It is understood that when Zou Heng fu publishing related tweets, its separation from the North.

As of press time, trial continues.

Judge said celebrity Internet infringement lawsuits take longer

Zhongguancun, Li Ying, Deputy Director of the judges of the Tribunal to hear too many celebrities Internet infringement suits. Li Ying said the biggest characteristic of this type of lawsuit is time-consuming, Zou Heng fu and the University's lawsuit from August 2012 has passed 2 years, has just completed a trial. "Cuiyongyuanhe Shimin defamation case, pre-trial exchange of evidence, often four or five times, extension of time limit for adducing evidence then the defence 3 times, then the defendant filed a counterclaim, cases were delayed for 6 months......"

"Celebrity to be issued through the media on the one hand to build up their public image, on the other hand, they themselves are the focus of. Celebrity rights lawsuit is to a large extent, is to express their attitudes and gestures to the public. ”

Li Ying said that some kind of intellectual celebrities, their understanding of the cases may be relatively simple, their fields of expertise and knowledge so that they may not be exactly standing in law to consider problems in terms of, for example, expectations are higher, and so on to the claim, "the judge in accordance with the law case, which has no connection with academic achievements or popularity of Kochi. ”

Text/Wang Wei

(Original title: bei da Kinky sticks being sentenced apologized, said Zou Heng fu weibo message case of Appeal appeal to submit new evidence in the morning)

Legal evening news