360 pronounced against the book of each case: 360 win browser awarded 1.5 million-360, 360, daily news-IT news
360 pronounced against the book of each case: 360 win awarded 1.5 million

On September 19, the 360 against the daily news (hereinafter referred to as the book of each) alleged false reporting case, against goodwill at the Shanghai xuhui district people's Court for formal sentencing. Court, the daily economic news reported false of 360 companies reputation right infringement, require the daily news apologized to the 360 company for ten days in a row, and compensation of 1.5 million Yuan.

The Court found that: the book of every series on subjective malice evident

In this case, the Court found that: the daily news published the mystery--qihoo 360 360 black box "of cancer genes in secret," and a series of false reports, with a strong subjective emotions and sharp attack, already significantly ahead of the news media's critical reports should be grasp in their normal limits.

The Court found that the comments in the each of the reports are contrary to the news media at work in supervision should be objective and neutral, apparent subjective malice, 360 commercial reputation and adversely affect the reputation of products, constitute a violation of 360 reputation right.

The Court found that: in connection with the report by, for example, metaphor, "industry experts" opinion quote in order, inter alia, small cards, exaggerated, strengthening the technical phenomenon, of 360 user groups believing the defendant reported content of malicious, presumed a serious invasion of privacy consequences, business reputation and adversely affect the reputation of the 360.

Court finds, each by reported on 360 company for not due competition of related technology means of analysis certification and obtained of conclusions, lack authoritative, and in selected zhiqian media reported Shi only select has on plaintiffs adverse of negative reported, exists tendencies, has contrary to news reported full heard parties party views, and objective reflect facts of principles, this based Shang to determines sex, and critique sex tone statement related conclusions, Department on layout facts of exaggerated, on 360 of commercial reputation and products reputation caused bad effects, In the case of technical problems open, in connection with the reports exaggerated and guide readers to open the certainty the outcome of the problem also constitutes a violation of 360 honorary rights.

Court also held that, after each company as the sponsor of the daily economic news and after each network copyright holders of published articles, and smell the company as per the network's organizers, also released in connection with the reports of behavior identified as joint tort.

The book of each was ordered to pay 1.5 million dollars

Based on these finds, the Court ruled that the daily news sold must be stopped with immediate effect from the 10th of February 26, 2013 1996th of the daily news newspaper, delete after each report and reproduced in connection with link, the daily economic news of 360 companies for compensation of 1.5 million Yuan.

Court while requirements, daily economic news this judgment entered into force of day up 10th within continuous 10th in daily economic news newspaper first version significantly location, and each by Network Home significantly location, continuous 7th in Sina network of financial and technology plate, and Sohu network of news section, and in the Green online network of rule of law section Home significantly on its violations honorary right behavior to 360 company apologized, elimination effects.

It is reported that the book of each was fined 1.5 million yuan in compensation, China has created a reputation right case of judicial compensation records.

The daily news expressed, race-related reports based on public interest grounds, through in-depth interviews with careful verification, session related to the Court sufficient evidence to prove that factual objective sources. In view of this, the newspaper will appeal against the judgment of the first instance of appeal, asked the superior court to ascertain the facts and make a fair judgment.