Former Vice head of Beijing Zoo denied the trial Prosecutor | corruption _ all charges | Zoo news

　　"What did he do to animals? "-Zoo" big corruption "xiaoshaoxiang first day of trial in mind

Beijing on August 20, Reuters new media (Xinhua tuming Luo Zheng Guang) 20th 9:30, white-haired xiaoshaoxiang was brought into the courtroom.

About 20 days ago, said the former Vice head of Beijing Zoo was prosecuted for alleged embezzlement of more than 14 million Yuan news, caused a public outcry, many people exclaimed: also such a Zoo had "massive corruption", small animals are "shocked"!

"Big corruption" how xiaoshaoxiang convergence into such a huge amount of money? What did he do to animals? 20th, during the hearing, xiaoshaoxiang how to say?

　　Details of the case? --"Don't remember"

On the second branch of the Beijing Municipal People's Procuratorate's indictment says, xiaoshaoxiang suspected of corruption include embezzlement Beijing Zoo birdhouse projects six bidding the project sum of 10.05 million dollars; claim for compensation of 220,000 yuan to the demolition company; the false invoices into the personal accounts of actual control. Amounted to embezzlement, cheating and other illegal means to acquire State properties totaling more than 14 million Yuan. In addition, xiaoshaoxiang there I can not prove legally sourced portion amounts to more than 8 million Yuan.

Day of the trial, after the Prosecutor read out the indictment, xiaoshaoxiang denies all the allegations. For case details, such as how to pay the money, he said "not sure."

Start a company making money? --Prosecutors allege, xiaoshaoxiang 10.05 million Yuan project for inclusion in the actual control of Beijing Tian Fei Yu carving art Department accounts, be embezzled. Xiaoshaoxiang at trial denies this. "Tin dragon doesn't matter to me. "Says Shaw, the legal entity operating the Department is high, and his relations with Gao's work.

Why is high, people will be under the direction of xiaoshaoxiang to open bank accounts? --Shaw argues that because he knew a bank clerk, by the way is introduced. In addition, the prosecutors also said that investigators had recovered from his xiaoshaoxiang Office Tian long BA BU business licenses, Shaw argued that "because the Minsheng bank check funds, I would come to the Tian long BA BU company information to help reconciliation. "In this regard, the prosecutors say, Shaw said were inconsistent with the testimony of other witnesses.

　　There will be animals "comfortable housing project" lined his pockets with money? --"Take the money, but the Zoo didn't loss"

Xiaoshaoxiang in court, said although her serve as the Zoo's Deputy Director, head of infrastructure work, but all the construction projects through public tendering procedures and bidding units to organize other construction units for construction.

"After winning general contractor, and then transferred to other construction team construct is legal, is also permitted. "Shaw said the 10.05 million dollar project are advanced to the company, because Gao has also worked in the transformation of the Zoo, didn't have the money.

According to the second branch of Beijing Municipal People's Procuratorate prosecutors in handling introduced 2006-2008 reconstruction of the Zoo, including enclosure of the renovation project, Panda House remodeling projects, each project has a number of small projects. 6 large projects, winning only 2 companies, where the dry construction company won the bid on 5, appropriate landscape companies bid on 1.

"These two companies get through the normal bidding process works. "The Prosecutor introduced, Gan was built after the company won the bid, the Zoo put money into the company accounts, company Treasury invoices via xiaoshaoxiang to the Zoo again.

6 works contracts of more than 30 million Yuan, 2 bid winner according to Shaw's request to return more than 21 million Yuan, Shaw back 10.05 million Yuan, will left money to the actual construction of the unit.

Shaw argued that although taking more than 10 million, but the Zoo didn't lose, "project was completed on time and the quality and quantity."

According to investigations by the prosecution, 6 engineering 7 million yuan in the bid price and the settlement price by post, together with Shaw took more than 10 million Yuan, the Zoo themselves to fill the hole in the more than 17 million Yuan.

　　8 million Yuan how to interpret unknown? --"Are you earn"

In the indictment on which the second branch of the Beijing Municipal People's Procuratorate, xiaoshaoxiang has more than 8 million Yuan could not explain a legitimate source, which is a focus of public concern in this case.

In court the same day, the Tribunal asked link to ask the source of this money problem, xiaoshaoxiang replies "is all they earn." However, the cross-examination of proof had to be carried out in the afternoon part, Shaw was not feeling well, court time is not long, and related issues also asked clarity.

The case will continue in the 21st hearing.

(Edit: SN182)
22:36 on August 20, 2014
Xinhua NET