Explosion?in?front?of?the?Shanxi?Provincial?Committee?of?the?producer?sentenced?to?death?a?motive?is?still?unclear?|?explosion?in?Shanxi?Provincial?Committee?|?the?death?penalty?_?news

　　Denied?appeal?motive?still?a?mystery

On?April?25,?the?Taiyuan?intermediate?people′s?Court?on?November?6?last?year,?"explosion?in?front?of?the?Shanxi?Provincial?Committee"?made?the?first-instance?verdict,?sentenced?to?death?accused?Feng?Zhijun,?which?says?it?does?not?appeal?to?the?Court.

5?months?after?the?incident,?Feng?Zhijun?made?the?bombing?motive?is?still?unknown.?Official?calling?it?"taking?revenge?on?society",?but?did?not?explain?the?reason?of?taking?revenge?on?society.?Feng?Zhijun′s?wife?said?their?mental?disorder.

　　Feng?Zhijun?tried?death?penalty?appeal

According?to?Xinhua,?November?6,?2013?2:40,?Feng?Zhijun?with?9?pieces?of?homemade?explosive?device?placed?near?yingze?Street,?Taiyuan?yingze?East.?7:40?to?8?o′clock,?9?explosive?devices?exploded?one?after?another?at?a?set?time.

Explosion?in?Taiyuan?yingze?Street?on?both?sides?of?the?green?belt,?North?of?the?main?entrance?of?the?Shanxi?provincial?party?Committee,?South?Shanxi?Province?Department?of?science?and?technology.?The?case?1?people?died?on?the?spot?and?17?others?injured.

On?November?8,?2013?at?2?o′clock?in?the?morning,?police?declared?the?case?will?break,?Feng?Zhijun?suspects?was?arrested?in?Taiyuan.?After?the?incident,?police?said?Feng?Zhijun?residence?seizing?privately-made?explosive?devices,?found?a?lot?of?evidence?of?a?crime,?and?the?detection?of?its?modus?operandi?when?driving?the?vehicle.

Feng?Zhijun?42,?Xinghualing?District?in?Taiyuan?City?people.?This?reporter?has?learned?that?he?was?a?taxi?driver,?mostly?at?night.?His?family?says,?the?night?and?the?next?day,?on?November?6?and?7th,?Feng?Zhijun?car?to?work?normally?until?it?was?controlled?by?the?police.?Neighbors?said,?when?6th?out?of?the?car,?Feng?Zhijun?could?talk?to?neighbors?get?prodded.

On?April?16?this?year,?Taiyuan?intermediate?people′s?Court?of?the?first?instance?publicly?bombing?trial,?Feng?Zhijun,?Taiyuan?City?Procurator′s?Office?on?suspicion?of?bombing?against?the?accused?Feng?Zhijun?prosecution?according?to?law.

The?trial,?Feng?Zhijun?has?no?objection?to?public?prosecution?service?accused?of?crimes.

Yesterday,?Feng?Zhijun?Attorney?garrison?told?reporters?in?the?South,?on?April?25,?the?first-instance?verdict?in?the?case,?accused?Feng?Zhijun?have?been?sentenced?to?death.

When?outcomes?are?known,?Feng?Zhijun?said?not?to?appeal?to?the?Court.?In?court,?lawyers?after?the?meeting,?Feng?Zhijun?to?the?South?defenders?said?the?case?for?itself,?"life?and?death".

　　Motive?for?the?attack?remains?unclear

From?November?2013?the?incident,?in?April?this?year?the?first-instance?judgment,?Feng?Zhijun′s?motive?remains?unclear.

According?to?press?reports,?Feng?Zhijun?education?for?junior?secondary?schooling,?have?one?child,?there?is?no?tension?at?home.?His?wife?Yang?in?a?clothing?sell?clothing,?medium?level?of?homes?belonging?to?local?economic?conditions.

Abundance?in?Xinghualing?District?in?Taiyuan?City?a?common?district,?Feng?Jia?into?a?three-bedroom?apartment,?covering?an?area?of?about?130?square?metres.?Room?layout?and?decoration?are?medium,?and?no?different?from?ordinary?families.

A?week?after?the?explosion?incident,?abundant?living?room?windowsill,?still?with?two?large?barrels?of?fish?food.?Family?called?Feng?Zhijun?made?prior?to?the?incident,?fishing?is?the?largest?hobby?Feng?Zhijun,?Feng?Zhijun?often?go?fishing?in?the?southern?suburb?of?Taiyuan?jinyanghu?drive.

One?neighbor?recalled,?Toyoshi?are?more?enthusiastic?and?sometimes?drove?to?work?to?see?neighbors?out,?take?a?ride?he?often?greeted?people?on?the?bus.?In?the?eyes?of?his?father-in-law,?Feng?Zhijun?simple?social?relations,?in?addition?to?work,?stay?home?from?work,?"special?shoujia".

Afterwards,?Feng?Zhijun,?members?of?his?family?and?neighbors?were?perplexed?to?its?bombings.

Their?motive,?official?interpretation?of?"taking?revenge?on?society",?but?did?not?specifically?explain?why?Feng?Zhijun?taking?revenge?on?society.

Yesterday,?told?reporters?his?wife?Yang?Feng?Zhijun?said?Feng?Zhijun?before?the?crime?and?without?aura.?Mental?disorder?while?he?was?young,?"is?a?symptom?of?paranoia".

Yang?said?Feng?Zhijun?look?like?normal,?but?after?intensive?contacts,?its?sometimes?strange?behavior,?"no?one?could?walk?into?his?world".?Feng?Zhijun?in?2009?at?home?in?Upham,?rescued?refused?to?explain?to?his?family?after?the?suicides?and?strange?behaviour.

Yang?said?she?couldn′t?explain?Feng?Zhijun?specific?motive?of?the?crime.

Family,?in?March?this?year,?the?provincial?accreditation?body?a?mental?illness?psychiatric?evaluation?to?Toyoshi.?According?to?his?solicitor?the?South?defenders?said,?identification?display?Toyoshi?had?paranoid?personality?disorder,?bears?full?criminal?responsibility.

Yang?said?that?during?the?first?trial,?Feng?Zhijun′s?family?and?lawyers?who?have?been?on?the?identification?of?results?against?the?wannabe?identification?again,?but?was?refused.

In?addition,?authorities?said,?Feng?Zhijun?had?been?sentenced?to?9?years?′?imprisonment?for?theft.?Yang?said?that?the?offence?is?committed?by?Feng?Zhijun?young?from?the?explosion?incident?in?years,?it?is?difficult?to?believe?there?is?associated.

South?feed

(Original?title:?denial?of?appeal?motive?remains?a?mystery)

(Edit:?SN094)

02:20?on?April?29,?2014?Zhengzhou?evening?news



(

山西省委门前爆炸案制造者判死?作案动机仍不明|山西省委爆炸案|死刑_新闻资讯

　　拒绝上诉?动机依然成谜

　　4月25日，太原市中级人民法院对去年11月6日发生的“山西省委门前爆炸案”作出一审判决，被告人丰志均被判处死刑，其当庭表示不上诉。

　　案发5个多月后，丰志均制造爆炸案的动机依然不明。官方称其“报复社会”，但未解释报复社会的原因。丰志均的妻子则表示，其存在精神障碍。

　　丰志均一审判死刑不上诉

　　据新华社报道，2013年11月6日2时40分许，丰志均携带9枚自制的爆炸装置安放在太原市迎泽大街迎泽桥东附近。当日7时40分至8时许，9枚爆炸装置在其设定的时间陆续爆炸。

　　爆炸具体地点位于太原市迎泽大街两侧的绿化带内，北侧为山西省委正门，南侧为山西省科技厅。该案造成1人当场死亡、17人受伤。

　　2013年11月8日凌晨2时，警方宣布该案告破，犯罪嫌疑人丰志均在太原被抓捕归案。事发后，警方从丰志均住处缴获了私自制造的爆炸装置，发现了大量犯罪证据，并查获了其作案时驾驶的车辆。

　　丰志均42岁，太原市杏花岭区人。记者了解到，他是一名出租车司机，主要上晚班。其家人称，事发当晚和次日，即11月6日、7日晚上，丰志均仍正常出车上班，直至被警方控制。邻居则称，6日下午出车时，丰志均仍然跟邻居们打了招呼。

　　今年4月16日，太原市中级人民法院一审公开开庭审理了丰志均爆炸案，太原市检察院以涉嫌爆炸罪对被告人丰志均依法提起公诉。

　　庭审中，丰志均对公诉机关指控的犯罪事实没有异议。

　　昨日，丰志均的辩护律师南守军对记者称，该案于4月25日一审宣判，被告丰志均被判处死刑。

　　得知判决结果后，丰志均当庭表示不上诉。在庭后律师会见时，丰志均对南守军表示，案件确实为自己所为，“生死由命”。

　　动机仍不明朗

　　从2013年11月案发，到今年4月一审判决，丰志均的作案动机依然不明朗。

　　据记者了解，丰志均文化程度为初中肄业，育有一子，并无家庭矛盾。其妻子杨某则在某服装城卖服装，丰家的经济条件属于当地中等水平。

　　丰家位于太原市杏花岭区某普通小区，丰家为一套三居室，面积约130平方米。房间布置和装修均属中等，与普通家庭无异。

　　爆炸案发一周后，丰家客厅的窗台上，仍放着两大桶鱼食。家人称其为丰志均在案发前制作，钓鱼是丰志均最大的爱好，丰志均常驱车去太原南郊的晋阳湖钓鱼。

　　一名邻居回忆，丰志均比较热心，有时开车上班看到邻居出门，他常主动招呼别人上车捎一程。在岳父眼中，丰志均社会关系简单，除了上班，下班就待在家里，“特别守家”。

　　事后，丰志均的多名家人和邻居都对其爆炸行为表示不解。

　　对于其作案动机，官方解释为“报复社会”，但并未具体解释丰志均报复社会的原因。

　　昨日，丰志均的妻子杨某对记者表示，丰志均作案前并无先兆。他从年轻时就存在精神障碍，“像是妄想症的症状”。

　　杨某称，丰志均表面看似正常，但深入交往后，可知其有时举止怪异，“谁也走不进他的世界”。丰志均曾于2009年在家中割脉自杀，获救后拒绝向家人解释自杀原因，并曾有奇怪的举止。

　　杨某表示，她也无法解释丰志均作案的具体动机。

　　应家属要求，今年3月，山西省某精神疾病鉴定机构对丰志均作出精神鉴定。据其律师南守军称，鉴定显示丰志均有偏执型人格障碍，负有完全刑事责任能力。

　　杨某表示，在一审期间，丰志均的家人和律师曾对此鉴定结果不服，希望进行再次鉴定，但未获准。

　　此外，官方称，丰志均曾因盗窃被判处有期徒刑9年。杨某称，该犯罪行为系丰志均年轻时所为，距爆炸案发已经多年，难以相信两者存在关联。

　　南都供稿

(原标题：拒绝上诉?动机依然成谜)

（编辑：SN094）

2014年04月29日02:20

郑州晚报

)