Ting Xu sued the banks lost was convicted of abuse of right | Ting Xu | | suit _ news

According to a report in Nanfang daily, the afternoon of 6th, yuexiu District Court to Ting Xu tell banks to view statements of deposit contract dispute case, a ruling is made. First instance to "abuse of right" as an excuse, dismissing Ting Xu charged out of the program.

Once failure for ATM cash machines to steal 175,000 yuan Ting Xu, in May 21, 2012 completion of their sentences. On July 4 this year, Ting Xu to the Bank in connection with the printing trade Bill is rejected, the August 16, Ting Xu to yuexiu District Court, requiring banks to provide account details bank account statements so far.

Yuexiu courts believe that Ting Xu with knowledge of account books and records an error case, filed civil proceedings in the present case, asked him to provide it from accounts so far, the only real, legitimate and effective, correct, detailed statements, an abuse of the civil action, contrary to a civil action should be guided by the principle of good faith. Moreover, the account running list as one of the criminal evidence, criminal review identified and already in use, its contents, Ting Xu is known. Therefore, Ting Xu advocated requiring banks to provide bank account details so far from his bank statement claims, not part of the scope of the peoples Court accepts the code of civil procedure. Dismissing plaintiff Ting Xu's prosecution.

Verdict announced, Ting Xu said he appealed against the ruling in the first instance, will be appealed. Text/Liu Guannan Yue Yan

(Original title: suing Bank losing Ting Xu was convicted in the first instance "abuse of right")

(Edit: SN091)
December 08, 2013 The Beijing Youth daily
(
许霆状告银行一审败诉 被裁定滥用诉权|许霆|一审|诉权_新闻资讯

　　据《南方日报》报道，6日下午，广州市越秀区法院对许霆诉银行查看对账单的存款合同纠纷一案，作出裁定。一审以“滥用诉权”为由，从程序上裁定驳回许霆起诉。

　　曾经因ATM取款机故障而盗取17.5万元的许霆，于2012年5月21日服刑完毕。今年7月4日，许霆到涉案银行要求打印交易账单，遭到拒绝，8月16日，许霆到广州市越秀区法院起诉，要求银行向其提供开户至今的银行账户明细对账单。

　　越秀法院审理认为，许霆在明知账户记账记录出错的情况下，仍提起本案民事诉讼，要求被告向其提供从开户至今、唯一、正确、真实、合法、有效的明细对账单，是滥用民事诉权的行为，有悖于民事诉讼应当遵循的诚实信用原则。而且，《账户流水清单》作为刑事证据之一，已经刑事诉讼审查认定和使用，对其内容，许霆也是明知的。因此，许霆主张要求银行提供从其开户至今的银行账户明细对账单的诉讼请求，不属于人民法院受理民事诉讼的范围。裁定驳回原告许霆的起诉。

　　裁定结果公布后，许霆表示自己不服一审裁定，将要上诉。文/刘冠南 岳岩

（原标题：状告银行一审败诉 许霆被裁定“滥用诉权”）

（编辑：SN091）
2013年12月08日03:19
北京青年报
)