President of the Supreme Court: in almost every case were behind extorting | | Supreme Court of extorting | wronged and misjudged cases _ news

Injustices behind widespread Inquisition

Supreme Court sources said the illegal evidence exclusion in favour of protection of human rights

Legal evening news (reporters Wang Hong) yesterday, the Supreme Court convicted five Court presiding judge Gao Guijun "illegal evidence exclusion rules implementation issues" seminar, said extorting almost behind every wronged and misjudged cases, establishment of illegal evidence exclusion system conducive to the protection of human rights.

Said Gao Guijun, misjudged to air their grievances affecting the credibility of the judiciary and the country's image, even the rule of law to the public beliefs. Judging from the Supreme Court investigation, almost behind every wronged and misjudged cases have forced confessions.

As early as after she xianglin's case appears, the Supreme Court on the drafting of relevant provisions of illegal evidence exclusion, but at that time no consensus on this issue, and does not exist in the file. Zhao zuohai after the case has raised concern of society about illegal evidence exclusion issue. In 2010, the two jointly issued the provisions on handling criminal cases excluding illegally obtained evidence.

The criminal code changes to the illegal evidence exclusion system rises to the law, from the system to further curb torture and other illegal ways to collect evidence, to respect and protect human rights is of great and far-reaching significance.

Dai Yuzhong, a professor at Renmin University said, the establishment of a scientific, comprehensive, and effective exclusionary rules and implement it, will be conducive to the protection of the rights of criminal suspects or defendants; reduce and contain wronged and misjudged cases.

(Edit: SN095)
November 29, 2013 Legal evening news
(
最高院庭长:几乎每起冤案背后都存在刑讯逼供|刑讯逼供|最高院|冤假错案_新闻资讯

　　冤案背后普遍存在刑讯逼供

　　最高法人士称非法证据排除有利于保障人权

　　法制晚报讯(记者汪红) 昨天，最高院刑五庭庭长高贵君在“非法证据排除规则实施问题”研讨会上表示，几乎每起冤假错案背后都有刑讯逼供存在，建立非法证据排除制度有利于保障人权。

　　高贵君说，冤错案件的出现影响了司法机关的公信力及国家的形象，甚至影响到公众的法治信仰。从最高院的调研来看，几乎每起冤假错案背后都有刑讯逼供存在。

　　早在佘祥林案件出现后，最高院就起草了非法证据排除的有关规定，只是当时对此问题未形成共识，文件没有出台。赵作海案件出来后，引发了全社会对非法证据排除问题的高度关注。2010年，两高联合发布了《办理刑事案件排除非法证据若干问题的规定》。

　　《刑事诉讼法》修改将非法证据排除制度上升为法律规定，从制度上进一步遏制刑讯逼供和其他非法收集证据的方法，对于尊重和保障人权具有重大而深远的意义。

　　中国人民大学教授戴玉忠说，建立一个科学、完备、有效的非法证据排除规则并贯彻实施，将有利于保护犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的权利；减少和遏制冤假错案发生。

（编辑：SN095）
2013年11月29日16:56
法制晚报
)