Education after the judge pronounced LEE: sentenced to 10 years has nothing to do with who you are son | two | | judgement victims _ news

Reporter He Li Dan, Beijing

On November 27, 2013, the first intermediate people's Court of Beijing municipality on Lee and four other men raped a second instance of Appeal ruled that final ruling rejected the appeal and upheld the. This meant Lee would face 10 years.

After the verdict the defendant appears between. The afternoon of November 27, was one of the small counsel wei Hu Juan reporters to 21st century economic report, Xiao Wei and their families against the verdict is "very satisfied", "in their expectations."

Lee a certain party in the second instance judgement handed down whether complaints? So Lee's main defence lawyer Zhang Qi Huai acts of second instance late on November 27 with a 21st century business Herald journalist confirmed in an interview to the complaint argued that "as long as the statutory procedure, we will go down. ”

Zhang Qi Huai sigh, second-instance verdict, "is within our expectation, beyond the expected. He is guilty of 10, one term is the sum of three other minors, is 2.5 times times Wei with his age, this sentence must be wrong. ”

Xinhua News Agency reported, the Court explained, Lee brought belonging to criminal intent in a joint crime, the main perpetrators of violence, status and role of significantly greater than other defendants without repentance. Underage students in view of its crime, its lighter punishments according to the law, sentenced to 10 years ' imprisonment.

On November 19 the second trial amounted to about 13 hours. Defense for the 21st century business Herald correspondent says, in this case in the second instance, Li, Wang and his new lawyers are of the view that this case as a case of prostitution rather than rape, so insist on defense of innocence; and 3 other defence counsel of the accused insist crime debate. "Similar to the dividing line between defence policy and in second instance trial. "Someone involved in the second trial defence counsel told this reporter.

Zhang Qi Huai said he's done for so Lee is "skeptical debate", "judgments of the first instance of facts and evidence, ascertain the facts and sent back for retrial. Court found the evidence insufficient to conviction, with witnesses are contradictory statements. ”

Court says trial, Lee justified "entered the room and soon after fell asleep, no sexual relations with the victim". This Court said, although from the victim's underwear was not detected in semen, but integrated other confessions of the accused and to testify in court, victim statements and other evidence, to demonstrate clear and stable first sexual relations with the victim of the fact.

Informed sources involved in the case, Lee has always insisted the case was just whoring is not rape, and that he was not involved in, ne bis in idem claimed Lee entered the room just got a call from its parent dreams of pigeon, he was out the door to answer the phone, and then came "saw nothing, no participation in"; while in a trial, he claimed to have drunk, fell asleep. Zhang Qi Huai explained that phone records showed that Lee three times that night, he took his mother's calls, "every phone has a couple of minutes" when he goes out "on at least three occasions" when he first called "drunk", "not in conflict. No ' confession ', said. ”

Zhang up Huai said, as Lee x of II trial lawyer, he main is to court made again adjustable take number Department key Department of objective evidence, including incident room of next door room top camera by recording of monitoring video, and the Hubei building, and gold Ding Xuan, and near KFC of toilet, and hospital, several Department front of monitoring video, "II trial Shi I mention has 20 copies adjustable take evidence of clues, these evidence can proved victims and accused Zhijian is what state, victims has no hurt", he also applications has victims Yang x appear, But the courts have not recognized, did not obtain.

Earlier media reports, in the second instance before the trial ended, so Lee read out to the Court by himself by writing, up to 10 minutes of "final statement", and bowed three times, he said, "so it's just because I'm Li shuangjiang, son? If I'm sentenced to a few years less, admitted that I didn't do something, I'm sorry that my parents, sorry family honor. Admit that I have not done things called okay? ”

A source who was present recalled, when Lee looked calm. Foregoing insiders told reporters, on November 27, the Court handed down after the Court stages of education, particularly to hear the verdict of the judges said, made such a decision, nothing to do with whose son you are.

In the view of Zhang Qi Huai acts, judicial procedure, at the appeals stage there is still a "revisionist" possibilities. If this is a "war", "the ' war ' has just begun, we just get your facts a little restored, only to pull the cut. We're still waiting for the final results. "The rush's lawyer said.

Source: the 21st century business Herald

(Edit: SN091)
November 28, 2013 Shenzhen news net
(
法官宣判后教育李某某:判10年跟你是谁儿子无关|判决|二审|被害人_新闻资讯

　　本报记者 贺莉丹 北京报道

　　2013年11月27日，北京市第一中级人民法院对李某某等五人强奸上诉一案进行二审宣判，终审裁定驳回上诉，维持原判。这意味着李某某将面临10年刑期。

　　判决后各被告方态度出现分野。11月27日下午，被告人之一小魏的辩护律师胡娟对21世纪经济报道记者称，小魏及其家属对判决结果都“非常满意”，“这在他们的预期之内”。

　　就李某某方在二审判决下达后是否会申诉？李某某的二审主辩律师张起淮在11月27日晚间接受21世纪经济报道记者采访时肯定了要申诉的主张，“只要法定程序许可的，我们都会往下走。”

　　张起淮感叹，二审的判决结果，“是在我们的预料之内，预期之外。定他有罪10年，他一人的刑期是其他三个未成年人的总和，是跟他同龄的大魏的2.5倍，这个量刑肯定错了。”

　　新华社报道显示，法院方面解释，李某某在共同犯罪中属于犯意提起者、主要暴力行为实施者，地位与作用明显大于其他被告人，且无悔罪表现。鉴于其犯罪时系未成年在校学生，对其依法从轻处罚，判处其有期徒刑10年。

　　11月19日二审庭审共计约13小时。有被告辩护律师对21世纪经济报道记者称，在本案二审中，李某某、王某及其新律师均认为，此案件为一起卖淫嫖娼案而并非强奸案，因此坚持作无罪辩；而其他3位被告人的辩护律师坚持做罪轻辩。“二审辩护策略的分野与一审相似。”一位参与二审开庭的被告辩护律师告诉本报记者。

　　而张起淮称，他为李某某做的是“存疑之辩”，“一审的判决事实和证据不足，应该查清事实，发回重审。法院认定的那些证据不足以能够定罪，用的是证人之间相互矛盾的口供。”

　　法院则称，庭审中，李某某辩解称“进入房间不久后就睡着了，没有与被害人发生性关系”。对此法院表示，虽然从被害人内裤上没有检测到李某某的精斑，但综合其他被告人供述及当庭指证、被害人陈述等证据，明确且稳定地证明李某某第一个与被害人发生性关系的事实。

　　参与此案知情人士透露，李某某一直坚持本案只是嫖娼，并非强奸，且他未参与，二审时李某某自称一进事发房间就接到其母梦鸽的来电，他遂出门接电话，回来后“什么也没看见、也没参与”；而在一审时他声称喝醉了、睡着了。张起淮解释，通话记录确有显示，李某某当晚曾接过其母的三次来电，“每个电话都有几分钟”，彼时他出门“至少三次”，这与他一审时所称“喝多了”的行为发生有先后，“不冲突。没有‘翻供’之说。”

　　张起淮称，作为李某某的二审律师，他主要是向法院提出再调取数处关键处的客观证据，包括事发房间的隔壁房间顶上摄像头所录制的监控视频，及湖北大厦、金鼎轩、附近肯德基的厕所、医院等几处门前的监控视频，“二审时我提了20份调取证据的线索，这些证据可以证明被害人和被告人之间是什么状态，被害人有没有伤”，他亦申请了受害人杨某某出庭，但法院均未认可，也未调取。

　　此前媒体报道，在二审庭审结束前，李某某当庭宣读了由其本人所写、长达10分钟的“最后陈述”，并三次鞠躬，他说，“难道就因为我是李双江的儿子吗？如果我为了少判几年，就承认我没有做的事情，我对不起我的父母，对不起家族的荣誉。承认我没有干的事情难道就叫做态度好吗？”

　　一位当时在场的知情人回忆，彼时李某某神色平静。前述知情人对本报记者称，就在11月27日法院宣判结束后的法庭教育阶段，法官特别对当场听取判决结果的李某某说：作出这样的判决，跟你是谁的儿子没有关系。

　　而在张起淮看来，司法程序上，在申诉阶段仍有“翻案”的可能性。如果说这是一场“战争”，“‘战争’才刚刚开始，我们只是把事实稍微还原一下，只是把这个口子拉开了。我们还在等待最后的结果。”这位行色匆匆的律师说。

　　来源：21世纪经济报道

（编辑：SN091）
2013年11月28日04:53
深圳新闻网
)