Headphone enthusiast, do not burn-burn unit, headphones-IT information Headphone enthusiast, do not burn unit

Break-in is a fast aging equipment and thus the stability of measures, many enthusiasts think by burning machine can make the headset the headset's performance is more stable, better sound quality , but from the WIRED article said, this is indeed unnecessary.

Break-in could spread so long, affecting such a broad, to a large extent, there is no quantitative evidence to demonstrate that it is useless (or useful), headset manufacturers rather than risk I made any comment, break-in, after all, does not have a great impact on their sales, many a thing less thing.

For consumers is far from no impact. Now circulating on the network of good pot method takes about 40-400 hours, and between them are expected to switch songs. Pot enthusiasts use "songs" wide, Tsai Chin song is a lot of break-in album required and not just traditional songs, higher-end burning machines also include a plain ring, a white noise, sine wave scanning ... ...

Frankly, any mechanical products which have been in use for some time after you make changes, but these changes is beneficial whether or not is another thing.

Many fans pointed out in most people's view and details like "paranormal activity", as the break-in that involves psychology, applied sciences, marketing, and eternal, and subjective "quality" issue. All of this combined to make pot problem is particularly complex.

Shure (Shure) to monitor product Director Matt Engstrom acknowledged that some bulky headset sensors will have aging phenomenon, "in theory" that will result in changes in vocal expression. But there is no conclusive evidence to support this.

Shure E1 headphones whose ever tested one (released in 1997), what is the result? Tests have shown that the E1 headphones now, performance indicators, and then when you walked down the line. Shu, for 15 years the company has been in the design and production of headphones, Shure engineers to validate this conclusion again and again, the sensor's performance on the first day, the first years, or five years, there is no difference – unless you accidentally dropped it.

Another way to think, if pot really makes the piece better, why headphones manufacturer does not burn well, selling products the best performance?

Seems to be testing were more likely to indicate that break-in did not bring a headset performance improvements while break-in does not cause damage to the headphones, it is a personal choice, it's special, do not believe spirit is not. But if you spend a lot of time and effort on this activity, which it is not necessary. Weight loss has been troublesome enough, buy a headset to listen to music, you don't toss it again.

耳机发烧友，请不要煲机了 - 煲机,耳机 - IT资讯
耳机发烧友，请不要煲机了

煲机是一种快速使器材老化进而稳定的措施，许多耳机发烧友认为通过煲机可以让耳机的表现更加稳定，音质更好，但来自WIRED的文章则称，这种做法实在没有必要。

煲机的说法之所以可以流传这么久、影响这么广，很大程度上在于没有量化的证据证明它无用（或者有用），各大耳机制造商们也不愿冒着风险就此发表什么意见，毕竟煲机的做法不会对他们的销量产生很大影响，多一事不如少一事。

可对于消费者来说就远不是没影响了。现在网络上流传的好的煲机方法耗时约为40到400个小时，其间还需要按时切换歌曲。煲机爱好者们使用的“歌曲”范围广泛，蔡琴的歌是很多煲机专辑必选的，而且不仅是传统意义的歌曲，较高端的煲机方案还包括纯铃声、白噪音、甚至正弦波扫描……

坦白讲，任何机械制品在使用一段时间后都会发生变化，但这些变化是否是有利的就是另一码事了。

许多发烧友所指出的现象和细节在大多数人看来都像“超自然现象”一样，煲机的说法涉及到心理学、应用科学、市场营销，以及永恒而又主观的“音质”问题。这一切组合在一起让煲机问题显得格外复杂。

舒尔（Shure）监听产品总监Matt Engstrom承认，一些体积较大的耳机的传感器会有老化现象，在“理论上”这种现象会导致声音表现力的变化。但没有决定性证据佐证这一点。

舒尔曾经测试过一部使用很久的E1耳机（于1997年发布），结果如何呢？测试表明这部E1耳机现在的性能指标和当时走下生产线时一样。15年来舒尔公司一直在设计生产耳机，舒尔工程师们一次又一次地验证着这个结论，这些传感器的性能在第一天、第一年、第五年没有什么差别——除非你不小心摔过它。

换个角度想，如果煲机真的可以让耳机性能更好，为什么耳机厂商不事先煲好，把产品调整到最佳性能再卖呢？

似乎各种测试更倾向于表明煲机并不能带来耳机性能改善，同时煲机也不会对耳机造成什么损害，它是很一种个人化的选择，信则灵，不信则不灵。但如果在这项活动上耗费大量的时间和精力，它就显得很没必要。减肥已经够让人头疼了，买个耳机听音乐就不要再折腾了吧。