Pilot trial in the Supreme Court next month in Shanghai | | | jurisdiction reform in Shanghai _ the operating mechanism reform news

The Supreme Court recently issued a notice, in Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Guangdong, Shaanxi and other provinces and cities some Court of deepening the reform of operation mechanism of judicial openness, trial pilot. Reform will be officially launched in December this year, for a period of two years.

　　Deepening the reform of operation mechanism of judicial trial

Supreme Law of having their status changed to official said, pilot project main objective is to establish the judicial jurisdiction of the laws of operation mechanism, optimal allocation of judicial resources, strict implementation of a single judge, a collegial panel, the Judiciary Committee handling responsibilities, to the greatest extent to meet the people's demands for Justice, improving judicial public faith, establishing judicial authority.

Hu Yunteng, Director of the Research Office of supreme law told reporters that deepening the reform of operation mechanism of judicial jurisdiction is explicitly one of the important elements in the Supreme Court issued opinions, which included deepening the reform of the system of the Judicial Committee, perfect composition of the Judicial Committee, clear the Commissioners of the Judicial Committee responsibilities, improving and perfecting the working rules and the rules of procedure of the Judicial Committee, supervising mechanisms, such as the establishment of the trial Committee resolution.

November 23, 2010, the Supreme Court set up trial management office, with a view to adopting a scientific and rational and effective trial management, promote the improvement of trial quality, enhance judicial credibility. In recent years, on the full reform has also been useful to explore.

Hu Yunteng said, deepening the reform of Dean, President of trial management responsibilities, establish Dean, President of right of trial management throughout the traces system, strengthening constraints on the President, the President of exercising the right of trial management and monitoring to prevent abuse of trial management, was the reform of "plays".

He said that as the trial unfolds, and push reform course will become increasingly clear.

　　President, the President should be more involved in the case

The pilot reform to strengthen the President, the President referred to in exercising the right of trial management constraints, Director of Constitution and administrative law research center of Peking University Professor Jiang Mingan in said in an interview with reporters yesterday morning, the President, the President is an important part of the internal management of the Court, the orientation of the reform should be "administrative", they should be more involved in the trial.

Prof Jiang Mingan, President, the President is actually judges and is the best judge of the Court. Dean is the Chief Judge of the Supreme People's Court, but people seldom saw him hearing the case, presiding judge of the other levels of the President of the Court, as well.

Now, in our court system, more as a premier, President of the executive leadership, however, Premier, President of the Administration, not the trial is actually a waste of judicial resources.

Professor Jiang Mingan believes that other administrative services can be made by other relevant departments on staff. In the case of the proceedings, form a new collegial panel when they can when the presiding judge, to participate in the trial, as a means of enhancing quality of court case.

At the same time, before the full Court held hearings, should not be President, Presidents; after the end of the hearing of the case, should not let the President, the President of the instructions on the case. In the process of reform of the internal management of the Court, only starting from the Dean and President of "administrative" in order gradually to achieve the ultimate objective of the reform of the judiciary.

Consolidated the legal evening news reported the legal daily

(Edit: SN098)
November 16, 2013 Modern express
(
最高法下月在上海等地试点审判权运行机制改革|上海|审判权|改革_新闻资讯

　　最高法日前下发通知，在上海、江苏、浙江、广东、陕西等省市部分法院开展深化司法公开、审判权运行机制的试点改革。改革将于今年12月正式启动，为期两年。

　　深化司法审判权运行机制改革

　　最高法司改办有关负责人表示，试点工作主要目标是建立符合司法规律的审判权运行机制，优化配置审判资源，严格落实独任法官、合议庭、审判委员会办案责任，最大程度地满足人民群众对公平正义的需求，提高司法公信，树立司法权威。

　　最高法研究室主任胡云腾告诉记者，深化司法审判权运行机制改革是最高法下发意见中明确的重要内容之一，其中就包括深化审判委员会制度改革，完善审判委员会构成，明确审判委员会专职委员职责，改进和完善审判委员会工作规则和议事规程，建立审判委员会决议督办机制等方面。

　　2010年11月23日，最高法成立审判管理办公室，以期通过科学、合理、有效的审判管理，促进提高审判质效，提升司法公信力。近年来，各地围绕合议庭改革也进行了有益探索。

　　胡云腾介绍说，深化院长、庭长审判管理职责改革，建立院长、庭长行使审判管理权全程留痕制度，加强对院长、庭长行使审判管理权的约束和监督，防止审判管理权滥用，是本轮改革的“重头戏”。

　　他表示，随着试点的开展和推进，改革路线必将越来越清晰。

　　庭长、院长应该更多地参与案件审理

　　对于此次试点改革中提到要加强对院长、庭长行使审判管理权的约束，北京大学宪法与行政法研究中心主任姜明安教授昨天上午在接受记者采访时表示，庭长、院长是法院内部管理的重要部分，改革的方向应是“去行政化”，他们应该更多地参与案件的审理工作。

　　姜明安教授表示，院长、庭长实际上也是法官，而且是该法院最好的法官。像最高人民法院的院长是首席法官，但是人们却很少看到他审理案子，其他各级法院的院长、庭长也是一样。

　　现在，在我国法院系统里，更多地把院长、庭长当做一个行政领导，但是，院长、庭长只进行行政管理工作，不审案实际上是一种司法资源的浪费。

　　姜明安教授认为，其他行政上的事务可以由其他相关部门工作人员承担。在案件的审理过程中，组成合议庭的时候，他们可以当审判长，参与到审判当中，以此加强各级法院的案件审判质量。

　　同时，在合议庭开庭审理案件之前，不应该请示院长、庭长；案件审理结束后，也不应该让院长、庭长对案件做批示。在法院内部管理的改革过程中，只有从院长、庭长开始“去行政化”才能逐步实现司法改革的最终目标。

　　综合《法制晚报》《法制日报》报道

（编辑：SN098）
2013年11月16日04:45
现代快报
)