Supreme Court: not appropriate for trial judges to transfer removal | | remove | Justice _ news, October 30, 2013, (editors: SN095)
Supreme People's Court on 28th press briefing, released on effectively carrying out justice, enacted by the Supreme People's Court to vigorously strengthen the impartial justice, improving judicial public faith force opinions.
Hu Yunteng, Director of the Research Office of the Supreme People's Court opinion highlights, innovations, as well as in carrying out justice for the people, the people's Court to justice, enhance judicial credibility and innovation aspects of interpretation of new initiatives. Hu Yunteng said the introduction of views will serve as a programmatic document of the people's courts in the new era, guiding in near future the work of people's courts. In addition, the Supreme People's Court has been specially prepared comments on the working mechanism of prevention of criminal misjudged cases to air their grievances, to be released in the near future.
Introduction background the masses desire for Justice under pressure
In recent years, people's demand for Justice is growing, the rising caseload of people's Court accepted every year, and since 2008, the people's court cases each year in more than 10 million, case not only is so large, and new types of cases, more complex cases, mediation and getting more and more difficult.
Expert analysis
Masses in the new period on new requirements, new expectations of the administration of Justice, the judiciary is facing greater pressure and challenges. Main performance for: masses more desire justice just, requires court excluded interference, strictly law independent case; more desire justice efficient, requires Court strictly according to legal provides of trial limited case, as reduced litigation cost; more desire justice authority, requires court timely "CASHES" referee, makes they of won interests as soon as possible achieved; more desire justice open, requires court handle cases of process open transparent, put an end to any "Camera Obscura operation"; more desire dignity, requires Court respecting they of the right, Equal treatment of the parties. "Some cases trial quality not high, and referee injustice, problem still exists; some restriction court work development of institutional mechanism obstacles yet break, many area of reform also needs continues to exploration; part court case more people less, and talent loss, and judge fault, problem still serious, some Court of judge continued overload work, physical and mental health Kham worries; minority specializes in style not are, some court and judge occurred corruption problem, caused bad effects,. Views from a macro-level, raises the overall thinking on solutions to these problems. ”
The opinion highlights the independent tried to resist protectionism
The comments called, insisted exercise jurisdiction independently according to law, resolutely resist local and departmental protectionism in all its forms, firmly ruled out of power, money, favors, all interference from external factors, such as the relationship between, and constantly improve protection legally independent and impartial judicial power should be exercised by the court system.
Presidents or Vice-Presidents of courts at all levels, members of the Judiciary Committee, the President and the Vice-President, strongly supported the full and sole court case a fair hearing according to law, a superior court must firmly support the lower court, independent and impartial judicial power should be exercised according to law.
Not illegal yet judges
All judges are not allowed to break the law for any reason the bottom line, in an attempt to go beyond the law, bending the law, and the incidence of other illegal yet judges. Try each case, must carry out the facts clear, applicable law, processing results are fair and legitimate trial procedures, legal instruments are essential requirements of the specification.
Non-intervention ahead of house demolition
Around the judicial functions serve the greater good. Case decision carefully and properly handled due to imbalance of economic and social development, and social development lagging behind, social management of various disputes caused by missing, overall considerations associated with the various factors and the impact of decisions on various aspects to prevent mismanagement and intensify social contradictions. Non-staff members of the Court participating local merchants, a joint law enforcement, early intervention is strictly prohibited in land expropriation, housing demolition and concrete administrative activity.
Expert analysis
Supreme People's Court is the real measure, for the current part judges handle cases according to law, and not afraid to handle cases according to law, "sword", judge strict views handle cases according to law, dare to handle cases according to law and responsibility.
Trial management authority shall wholly left marks
Opinion suggested that the President and the President of the Court of trial management responsibilities will be reformed, its trial management should focus on the examination and approval of related procedural matters, the comprehensive trial: General guidance, comprehensive monitoring of trial quality management as well as to exclude undesirable elements, such as interference with the trial. At the same time, should establish Dean, President of the exercise of the right to trial management throughout the traces system, strengthen the premier, President of the constraints of the exercise of the right to trial management and monitoring to prevent abuse of the trial management.
Open up list of faith the person subjected to execution
The views put forward, promise established the person subjected to execution list of open systems, the list with the butt of the social credit system, achieving case information sharing. In addition, the views put forward by improvement of the person subjected to execution of property survey system, use various means to sanction to resist implementation and avoid the implementation of the Act.
Expert interpretation
Views require focus on the overall design and holistic reform, strengthen the coordination between the reform measures. Adhere to the bottom was pushed forward reforms, without violating the General requirements under the premise of legal and judicial reform, encouraging specific reform initiatives by the local court to explore, and accumulated experience in reform, but major reforms concerning overall situation, steadily advancing must be deployed in Central.
Perfect single evaluation criteria
In terms of the proper administration of Justice, views put forward four new initiatives, including the enhanced quality of court cases, intensive case management, improve the quality assessment system, improving and perfecting the single evaluation standards and mechanisms of accountability. The opinion states that, based on the actual trial work, the establishment of evaluation system for science fair misjudged clearly misjudged the pleading standards, sound analysis and accountability mechanisms for misjudge, perfect misjudged cases analysis and accountability procedures, which distinguish between different cases of misjudged cases and corresponding responsibilities of different law enforcement mistakes.
Transferred for trial judges
Opinion calls for the establishment of scientific judges of performance appraisal system, and was reflected in orders discuss promotion, assessment, and so on. Not suitable for the trial judge, to make judges exit mechanism, removed from post and removed from the trial judge in due course.
Expert analysis
"Wrong to air their grievances is an enemy of judicial public faith. "These initiatives can be seen from the Supreme Court seeks to fully establish and improve prevention working mechanism of the single, in judicial session resolutely guard against unjust misjudged the bottom line.
In July, Central politics and Law Committee, first introduced to prevent grievances after a single guidance, specially drafted the Supreme People's Court on how to prevent criminal case a single mechanism. "At present to prevent criminal case a single working mechanisms are modifying phase, recently released soon, believe that it will be on guard against unjust positive effects on a single piece. "(Combination of Xinhua News Agency, China Court reports)
(Original title: independently tried to resist local and departmental protectionism)
Yanzhao metropolis daily
(最高法：不适合审判的法官要调离免职|法官|免职|司法_新闻资讯
2013年10月30日02:39
（编辑：SN095）
最高人民法院28日召开新闻通气会，公布了最高人民法院制定的《关于切实践行司法为民大力加强公正司法不断提高司法公信力的若干意见》。
最高人民法院研究室主任胡云腾对《意见》的亮点、创新以及人民法院在践行司法为民、公正司法、提高司法公信力、改革创新等方面的新举措进行了解读。胡云腾表示，《意见》的出台将作为新时期人民法院工作的纲领性文件，指导今后一个时期人民法院的工作。另外，最高人民法院专门起草了关于防范刑事冤错案工作机制的意见，近期即将发布。
出台背景群众渴望公正司法面临压力
近年来人民群众的司法需求不断增长，人民法院每年受理的案件量不断攀升，2008年以来，人民法院每年受理案件都在1000万件以上，案件不仅量大，而且新类型案件、复杂案件越来越多，调处难度越来越大。
专家解读
新时期人民群众对司法工作的新要求、新期待，使司法机关面临更大的压力和挑战。主要表现为：人民群众更加渴望司法公正，要求法院排除干扰，严格依法独立办案；更加渴望司法高效，要求法院严格按照法律规定的审限办案，尽可能降低诉讼成本；更加渴望司法权威，要求法院及时“兑现”裁判，使他们的胜诉权益尽快实现；更加渴望司法公开，要求法院办理案件的过程公开透明，杜绝任何“暗箱操作”；更加渴望尊严，要求法院尊重他们的各项权利，平等对待各方当事人。“一些案件审判质量不高、裁判不公等问题仍然存在；一些制约人民法院工作发展的体制机制障碍尚未破除，许多领域的改革还需要继续探索；部分法院案多人少、人才流失、法官断层等问题仍然严重，一些法院的法官持续超负荷工作，身心健康堪忧；少数干警作风不正，有的法院和法官发生腐败问题，造成恶劣影响等。《意见》就是从宏观层面，针对这些问题的解决提出了总体思路。”
《意见》亮点独立审判抵制保护主义
《意见》要求，坚持依法独立行使审判权，坚决抵制各种形式的地方和部门保护主义，坚决排除权力、金钱、人情、关系等一切法外因素的干扰，不断健全保障人民法院依法独立公正行使审判权的制度机制。
各级法院的院长、副院长、审判委员会委员、庭长和副庭长，要坚决支持合议庭和独任庭依法公正审理案件，上级法院要坚决支持下级法院依法独立公正行使审判权。
不得发生违法枉法裁判
全体法官不得以任何理由突破法律底线，杜绝任何超越法律、歪曲法律以及其他违法枉法裁判现象的发生。审理每一起案件，都要贯彻认定事实清楚、适用法律正确、处理结果公正、审判程序合法、法律文书规范的基本要求。
严禁提前介入房屋拆迁
围绕司法职能积极服务大局。通过个案裁判，审慎、妥善处理因经济社会发展失衡、社会建设滞后、社会管理缺失引发的各种纠纷，全面考量案件涉及的各种因素和裁判对各方面的影响，防止因个案处理失当激化社会矛盾。严禁法院工作人员参与地方招商、联合执法，严禁提前介入土地征收、房屋拆迁等具体行政管理活动。
专家解读
最高人民法院就是要用实实在在的举措，针对当前部分法官不依法办案、不敢依法办案的现象“亮剑”，《意见》要求法官严格依法办案，敢于依法办案，敢于担当责任。
审判管理权应全程留痕
《意见》提出，法院院长和庭长的审判管理职责将进行改革，其审判管理职责应集中在对相关程序事项的审核批准、对综合性审判工作的宏观指导、对审判质效进行全面监督管理以及排除不良因素对审判活动的干扰等方面。同时，应建立院长、庭长行使审判管理权全程留痕的制度，加强对院长、庭长行使审判管理权的约束和监督，防止审判管理权的滥用。
公开失信被执行人名单
《意见》提出，建立失信被执行人名单公开制度，将名单与社会征信体系对接，实现案件信息共享。此外，《意见》还提出通过完善被执行人的财产调查制度等方式，运用各种手段制裁抗拒执行和规避执行的行为。
专家解读
《意见》要求注重改革的整体设计和通盘考虑，加强改革措施之间的协调配合。坚持自上而下有序推进改革，在不违反法律和司法改革总体要求的前提下，鼓励地方法院就具体改革举措先行探索，积累改革经验，但对事关全局的重大改革，必须在中央统一部署下稳步推进。
完善错案评价标准
在公正司法方面，《意见》提出了四个方面的新举措，包括强化庭审质量、强化案件质量管理、完善案件质量评估体系、健全和完善错案评价标准和问责机制等。《意见》指出，根据审判工作实际，建立科学公正的错案评价体系，明确错案的认定标准，健全错案的分析和问责机制，完善错案分析和问责的相关程序，分清错案的不同情形及不同执法过错的相应责任。
调离不适合审判的法官
《意见》要求建立科学的法官业绩考评机制，并体现在晋职晋级、评先评优等方面。对于不适合从事审判工作的法官，要建立法官退出机制，适时调离审判岗位并免去法官职务。
专家解读
“冤错案是司法公信的大敌。”从这些举措可以看出，最高人民法院力图通过全面建立健全防范错案的工作机制，在司法审判环节坚决守住防范冤错案的底线。
今年7月份，中央政法委出台了首个防止冤错案的指导意见后，最高人民法院专门起草了关于防范刑事冤错案工作机制的意见。“目前防范刑事冤错案工作机制的意见正在修改阶段，近期即将发布，相信将会对防范冤错案件起到积极作用。”(综合新华社、中国法院网报道)
(原标题：依法独立审判抵制地方和部门保护主义)
燕赵都市报
)
