Shenzhen set to kill police were given a conflict with Marshal will appeal | Li Caikun | | confidence tricksters _ news, October 30, 2013, by the police (Editor: SN091)
Shenzhen intermediate people's Court should think on SIN condemned to death, but to pay compensation to the families of the victims and to be understood so that the light sentence
Express News reporter, Zhang Guofeng correspondent Wang Fang
Yesterday morning, the Shenzhen intermediate people's Court (hereinafter referred to as "Shenzhen intermediate people's Court") of the accused, Li Caikun murder case of first instance, intentional homicide sentenced the defendant to Li Caikun to death, suspended for two years, deprived of political rights for life.
Sentencing scheduled for 10 o'clock start of the day, after the originally scheduled starting time after half an hour, accused Li Caikun only by two bailiffs escorted into the sight of journalists. Li Caikun is they do not match, was escorted into the courthouse with her feet against the floor, unwilling to go with Marshal shoved each other; when they entered the Court, he kept turning around to see their families, were marshals stop after asked to face up to the judge, Li Caikun starts with the marshals pushed and bent from time to time, will need to make five judicial police officers towards the judges stand. The conflict with the Marshal in the process, he has also been asked Marshal "did you bring a gun", "get off of law", push bailiffs from time to time hold his shoulder cried out, "you're hurting me."
The judge read out the verdict in the process, Li Caikun more than to sigh and shenxiao, when the judge read to the overthrow of the evidence in support of their own and Li Caikun is no intentional killing burst into laughter, the judge made the discipline and ask them to comply with the Court therefore suspended.
Li Caikun in his closing argument stage shouting will appeal, and again, with the intent to use the same extruder court marshal a physical confrontation, was Marshal out of the Court.
Details of the case
Shot down after the victim their Pocket gold ring
Li Caikun born in 1984, before being arrested, the Shenzhen Municipal Bureau of Longgang branch Tigers police station.
Think the victims are too arrogant
Killed by confidence tricksters
Tried by the Shenzhen intermediate people's Court found that July 1, 2012, a victim class a class fellow land rather than a shadow investigation on suspicion of hoax reports were brought to the Tigers police station, by Li Caikun of the defendant to the victim to review any land and their fellow class a shadow. Upon examination, a shadow form submitting a case for lying about the merits of being 5th in administrative detention, July 1, 2012, and a fine of 200 Yuan. Land is not involved in misrepresenting facts, victims, in Long Xin station waiting room asked to await processing. Li Caikun, when examining a land, that land and a part of the class of victims, insulting invective civilian police and the public security organs "challenged" and systemic thorn tattoo, with a criminal record, there is potential harm to society, is manufacturing a fake knife-wielding robbery shot and killed Lu.
Pretending to speak with victims
Suddenly a gun shot in the head
On July 1, 2012 at 7 o'clock, Li Caikun found to bear false witness in the street soliciting business by yellow, and yellow tie hoax arrested one person. After obtaining the yellow agreed, Li Caikun returned to the police station, notify the victim of a landing can leave the class, and instead of carrying around a land line to the love, Longgang District, Shenzhen, South. Subsequently, Li Caikun asked to get off a landing in designated areas such as he, after Li Caikun himself to open a garage in front of the intersection, called yellow-certain hoax. Yellow, according to Li Caikun instructions and call the police, saying the gold ring was robbed. Li Caikun land and then walk back to class a drop-off point, disguised with some land and discuss things.
In this process, Li Caikun suddenly a gun to shoot some land. A land head shots fell, Li Caikun prepared in advance of the gold ring left front pocket of land and put it in a class, prepared in advance of the dagger in the hands of a land.
After shooting victim report
The next day were caught in the Conference room
Li Caikun then took out their cell phones to call 110 says I love South shot a knife-wielding robbery suspect shot and call duty room duty room phone to Tigers Tigers police station police station informed his shot the victim. At the Shenzhen Municipal Public Security Bureau of Longgang Branch Police Brigade WONG in the course of interrogation, Li Caikun found the defendant suspected of intentional homicide, on July 2, 2012 at about 3 o'clock in Conference Room Long Xin police accused Li Caikun captured.
Court finds that defendant Li Caikun ignore State laws, intentional deprivation of a person's life, one death caused by their conduct constituted manslaughter. Li Caikun as one of the armed police, committed the crime of intentional homicide Act, the circumstances of the crime and social impact extremely bad, danger to society is enormous, extremely serious crimes, should be sentenced to death according to the law, but Li Caikun compensation to the families of the victims and to gain understanding of the victim's family, Li Caikun can be sentenced to death does not have to be implemented immediately.
Lawyer perspective
Defence counsel believe that Li Caikun no murder motive
If you want to kill people don't call an ambulance
"The punishment is excessive, if found guilt, intentional killing is inaccurate. "Yesterday handed over, Li Caikun's lawyer Ding Yiyuan said in an interview with reporters, Li Caikun and there is no motive for murder.
Ding Yiyuan believes that since the public prosecution service on Li Caikun's motive in speculation reasoning, seen from the available evidence and causation, Li Caikun, does not have the subjective intent of the wilful deprivation of a person's life. "First, they only side of make, no big of interest conflict, Li Caikun of motives is wants fishing law enforcement, manufacturing a fake Rob case, to class a land captured turns, prevent its continues to against social; followed by, in crime Hou, he play has 110 and 120, if he really wanted to home class a land Yu kill if, simply without called ambulance to rescue; also, he only play has a gun, no up gun, and is in at no lights of situation Xia hit the jackpot hit has where, this reasonable suspected cannot ruled out. ”
Ding Yiyuan also said they think subjective motives of Li Caikun's imaginary defense, abuse of power, has led to serious consequences. "If he wants to beat him to death, and he had no need to design a robbery means he can take him to a remote area, and self-harm after he knocked out, you can, you can adopt a more subtle approach. "Ding Yiyuan believes that combining the merits, more abuse of Li Caikun, rather than voluntary manslaughter. "As the police use of firearms, there are strict rules, but he did not comply. ”
In the first session, Ding Yiyuan requesting psychiatric evaluation to Li Caikun, but the public prosecution service issued by the Shenzhen kangning hospital report and concluded that Li Caikun has no mental illness and IQ reaches 111, but Ding Yiyuan questioned. "If he is a normal person, he can't have done something so absurd and ridiculous, and meritorious service awards were wide of the mark, cracked a robbery only five minutes, minimal, meritorious promotion argument simply does not hold. "Ding Yiyuan said that when new to the case, and he Li Caikun are suspected to have mental disorders, at least intermittently, the mentally ill. "We would consider doing it again in second instance psychiatric evaluation. ”
When it comes to Li Caikun, said Ding Yiyuan, Li Caikun is a person who has an individual, holistic thinking more carefully after the incident, Li Caikun think that their actions are legal, not nervous at all and kept in the police station, watching the game ask who scored. "He thinks he's a law enforcement actions, he thought that the victim was a potential social security risk, ex-cons, he subjectively not for its own sake, his social security, image, policy of the police force (created in this case). ”
(Original title: Li Caikun homicide trial: reprieve)
Golden Goat excursions, Express News
(深圳设局杀人警察被判死缓 与法警冲突称会上诉|李才坤|警察|设局_新闻资讯
2013年10月30日02:50
（编辑：SN091）
深圳中院认为论罪应判死刑，但鉴于对被害人家属作出赔偿并获谅解因此轻判
■新快报记者 张国锋 通讯员 王芳
昨日上午，深圳市中级人民法院(下称“深圳中院”)对被告人李才坤故意杀人一案作出一审判决，以故意杀人罪判处被告人李才坤死刑，缓期二年执行，剥夺政治权利终身。
当天的宣判原定在10时开始，在原定开始时间过了半个小时后，被告人李才坤才由两个法警押着进入记者视线。李才坤显得十分不配合，先是在被押入法庭前用双脚抵住地板不愿往前走且与法警互相推搡；在进入法庭后，他又一直回头看自己的家属，被法警制止要求正视法官后，李才坤又开始与法警推搡，并不时弯下腰，一度需要五个法警一起让其朝向法官站直。在与法警冲突的过程当中，他还一直问法警“有没有带枪”、“懂不懂法律”，不时推开法警扣住他肩膀的手喊说“你弄疼我了”。
在法官宣读判决书的过程当中，李才坤也不止地叹气和哂笑，当法官念到其推翻证供为了佐证自己并没有故意杀人时李才坤更是突然大笑，法官因此多次暂停宣读并要求其遵守法庭纪律。
在最后陈述的阶段李才坤大喊一定会上诉，并再次与意图将其押出法庭的法警发生肢体冲突，最终被法警拉出法庭。
案情详情
开枪击倒被害人后把金戒指放其裤袋
1984年出生的李才坤，被捕前系深圳市公安局龙岗分局龙新派出所民警。
认为被害人太嚣张
产生设局击毙想法
深圳中院经审理查明，2012年7月1日1时20分，被害人班某陆与其老乡班某影因涉嫌报假案被带到龙新派出所调查，由被告人李才坤对被害人班某陆及其老乡班某影进行审查。经审查，班某影构成谎报案情，于2012年7月1日因谎报案情被行政拘留五日，并处罚款200元。被害人班某陆未参与谎报案情，在龙新派出所候问室等待处理。李才坤在审查班某陆时，认为被害人班某陆气焰嚣张，侮辱谩骂民警并向公安机关“叫板”，且此人全身多处刺有文身，有犯罪前科，有潜在社会危害性，就产生了制造一起假持刀抢劫案件将班某陆开枪击毙的想法。
假装与被害人谈事
突然掏枪击中头部
2012年7月1日晚上7时许，李才坤在街边找到为做假证揽生意的黄某某，并要求黄某某配合其报假案抓一个人。在取得黄某某同意后，李才坤返回派出所，告知被害人班某陆可以离开，并自行驾车搭载班某陆行至深圳市龙岗区爱南路附近。随后，李才坤要求班某陆下车在指定地方等他，李才坤自己则开车行至前方路口后，打电话通知黄某某报假案。黄某某依照李才坤指示打电话报警，称其金戒指被抢。李才坤遂下车步行回到班某陆下车地点，假装与班某陆商量事情。
在此过程中李才坤突然掏枪向班某陆开枪。班某陆头部中枪倒地后，李才坤将事先准备好的金戒指放在班某陆的左前裤袋里，又将事先准备好的匕首放在班某陆的手中。
射杀被害人后报案
次日在会议室被抓
然后李才坤拿出自己的手机拨打110报警说自己在爱南路开枪将一名持刀抢劫的嫌疑人击中，并拨打龙新派出所值班室电话向龙新派出所值班室通报了自己开枪击中被害人的情况。深圳市公安局龙岗分局刑警大队在审问黄某某的过程中，发现被告人李才坤涉嫌故意杀人，遂于2012年7月2日3时许在龙新派出所会议室将被告人李才坤抓获。
法院审理认为，被告人李才坤无视国家法律，故意剥夺他人生命，致一人死亡，其行为已构成故意杀人罪。李才坤作为一位持枪工作的人民警察，实施了故意杀人的犯罪行为，犯罪情节和社会影响极其恶劣，社会危害性极大，罪行极其严重，依法应当判处死刑，但鉴于李才坤对被害人家属作出赔偿并获得被害人家属的谅解，故可对李才坤判处死刑不必立即执行。
律师观点
辩护律师认为李才坤没有故意杀人动机
若想置人于死地根本不用叫救护车
“量刑过重，在认定罪名方面，故意杀人也是不准确的。”昨日宣判结束后，李才坤的辩护律师丁一元在接受记者采访时表示，李才坤并没有故意杀人的动机。
丁一元认为，公诉机关至今对李才坤的犯罪动机都处于猜测推理，从现有的证据和因果关系看，李才坤都不具备故意剥夺他人生命的主观故意。“首先，他们只有一面之交，没有大的利益冲突，李才坤的动机就是想要钓鱼执法，制造一个假抢劫案，把班某陆抓获归案，防止其继续危害社会；其次，在案发后，他打了110和120，如果他真想置班某陆于死地的话，根本不用叫救护车来抢救；此外，他只打了一枪，没有补枪，而且是在当时没有路灯的情况下歪打正着打中了要害，这种合理怀疑不能排除。”
丁一元还表示，他们认为李才坤的主观动机是假想防卫、滥用职权，导致了严重后果。“如果他想把他打死的话，他就用不着设计抢劫的手段，他可以把他带到一个偏僻的地方，自伤后把他打掉，都可以，可以采取更隐蔽的方式。”丁一元认为，结合案情来看，李才坤更符合滥用职权罪，而非故意杀人罪。“作为警察使用枪支有严格规定，但他没有遵守。”
在第一次庭审当中，丁一元曾提出要求对李才坤做精神鉴定，但公诉机关出具了深圳市康宁医院的报告书，认定李才坤没有精神疾病且智商达到111，但丁一元对此表示质疑。“如果说他是正常的人，他不可能做出这么荒唐、不可理喻的事情，立功嘉奖是不靠谱的，破获抢劫案只能加五分，微乎其微，立功晋升说法根本不成立。”丁一元说，在刚接触这个案子时，他就怀疑李才坤有精神障碍，至少是间歇性的精神病。“二审我们到时候会再考虑做一次精神鉴定。”
谈到李才坤，丁一元说，李才坤是一个很有个性的人，整体思维比较缜密，事发后，李才坤认为自己的行为是合法的，一点都不紧张，关在派出所的时候看球赛还问谁进球了。“他认为自己是一种执法行为，他认为被害人是一个潜在的社会危险分子，有前科等等，他主观上不是出于一己私利，他是出于社会的安全、警队的形象、政策力(制造了该案)。”
(原标题：李才坤故意杀人案一审：死缓)
金羊网-新快报
)
