Fact: Unicom charge a million bond for virtual operators-China Unicom, MVNO-IT news Fact: the virtual operator Unicom million security deposit
On June 19, industry media exposure today, Unicom to virtual operators to collect millions in bonds, such as a virtual network operator cannot complete development of the month "target user" to deduct the percentage margin.
It is understood that the development of virtual operators to declare the city a user expectations are usually higher points to get tender. Once the punishment policies, virtual operators at the time of bidding, not blindly increasing the number of users expected. For example, a virtual operators bid commitments, in Shenzhen in January can only develop 300,000 users.
Virtual operators charge to the author who asked not to be identified, said China Unicom "margin", a bid only verbal commitments, did not implement its commitments in the formal books. This is a constraint of the virtual operator China Unicom bid to prevent virtual operator sky promises, later failed to deliver. However, these sorts of "domestic discipline" penalties, at least 1-2 years later to clear. Whether China Unicom is able to perform it, remains to be seen.
The source also revealed that take the punishment to regulate the presence of virtual operators, China Unicom is not original, signed a contract with China Telecom companies also have similar penalties regulations.
I learned that zlt competitively to MVNO, Business commitment the minimum number of active users in each city, each city for 3,000 serial numbers, activation rate 50%, Unicom to lay down a number of numbers. At present, already aishide snail, GOME, suning, 14 virtual operators launch commercial trials most opened 61 cities across the country.
In this regard, China Unicom official said in an interview with the author, "it is a virtual network operator deliberately disgusting and we, the penalty policy does not represent company's intentions".
Prior to that, "China Unicom call snail snafu" eventually there were numerous, this "deposit" incident, and China Unicom and a misunderstanding of a virtual business about?